Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25364232›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2014

Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on palatal mucosal defects and tooth extraction sockets.

Ahmet Günay, Osman Fatih Arpağ, Serhat Atilgan, Ferhan Yaman, Yusuf Atalay, Izzet Acikan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of coenzyme QJournal of dental sciences · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmet GünayDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Osman Fatih ArpağDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.
Serhat AtilganDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Ferhan YamanDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Yusuf AtalayDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey.
Izzet AcikanDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Dicle University · TRMustafa Kemal University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on palatal mucosal defects and tooth extraction sockets in an experimental model. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats with a mean age of 7 weeks and weighing 280-490 g were used in this study. The rats were randomly divided into two groups: group A (the control group, n=21) and group B (the experimental group, n=21). Under anesthesia with ketamine (8 mg/100 g, intraperitoneally), palatal mucosal defects were created and tooth extraction was performed in the rats in groups A and B. Group A received no treatment, whereas group B received CAPE. CAPE was injected daily (10 μmol/kg, intraperitoneally). The rats were killed on days 7, 14, and 30 after the procedures. Palatal mucosa healing and changes in bone tissue and fibrous tissue were evaluated histopathologically.

resultPairwise comparisons showed no statistically significant difference between days 7 and 14 in either group (P>0.05). At day 30, bone healing was significantly better in group B (CAPE) than in group A (control) (P<0.05). Fibrinogen levels at day 30 were significantly higher in group A (control) than in group B (CAPE) (P<0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed no statistically significant difference in palatal mucosa healing levels between days 7 and 14 in both groups (P>0.05).

conclusionIn conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that CAPE can significantly improve tooth socket healing.

Indexed as

Tooth ExtractionAnimalsCaffeic AcidsMaleMouth MucosaPhenylethyl AlcoholRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTooth SocketWound Healingcaffeic acid phenethyl esterCaffeic AcidsPhenylethyl Alcoholcaffeic acid phenyl esterhealingpalatal mucosatooth extraction socket

Identifiers

PMID25364232
PMCPMC4211858
OpenAlexW2095320758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.