Differentiation in the

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. On the verge of extinction - revision of a highly endangered Swiss alpine snail with description of a new genus,ZooKeys · 2022
   Article
2. Genome-wide nuclear data confirm two species in the Alpine endemic land snailJournal of zoological systematics and evolutionary research = Zeitschrift fur zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung · 2020
   Article
3. Phenotypic plasticity can explain evolution of sympatric polymorphism in the hairy snailCurrent zoology · 2017
   Article
4. Ongoing Speciation and Gene Flow between Taxonomically Challenging Trochulus Species Complex (Gastropoda: Hygromiidae).PloS one · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract