Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25364035›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2014

Pregnancy After a Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy: a Case Report.

M Albowitz, V Schyrba, D Bolla, A Schöning, R Hornung

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pregnancy outcomes after abdominal sacrocervicopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pregnancy and Vaginal Delivery after Sacrohysteropexy.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M AlbowitzObstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
V SchyrbaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Heiden General Hospital, Heiden, Switzerland.
D BollaObstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
A SchöningObstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
R HornungObstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
University of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) is a rare condition during pregnancy. If all conservative treatments fail, the surgical approach has proven to be in non-pregnant women a very good option due to high efficacy and a very low morbidity and mortality rate. We are reporting on the clinical results of a 33-year-old pregnant woman with a past history of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy who delivered by caesarean section due to a foetal breech presentation. There are only a handful of cases reporting the outcome "pregnancy" after a laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy. Nevertheless, this appears to be a useful intervention for women with a POP unresponsive to conservative treatment and open family planning. Further studies with long-term follow-ups are required to confirm this.

Indexed as

deliverypelvic organ prolapsepregnancysacrohysteropexy

Identifiers

PMID25364035
PMCPMC4210379
OpenAlexW2014560101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.