Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25364031›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2014

Surgical Approach for Repair of Rectovaginal Fistula by Modified Martius Flap.

M Reichert, T Schwandner, A Hecker, A Behnk, E Baumgart-Vogt, F Wagenlehner, W Padberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tissue selecting technique for adult women with low rectovaginal fistula.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Recto-vaginal fistulas: A case series.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M ReichertDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen.
T SchwandnerDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen.
A HeckerDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen.
A BehnkDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen.
E Baumgart-VogtInstitute for Anatomy, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen.
F WagenlehnerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen.
W PadbergDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) are rare but represent a challenge for both patients and surgeons. The most common cause of RVF is obstetric trauma, and treatment is based on fistula classification and localization of the fistula in relation to the vagina and rectum. Conventional therapy frequently fails, making surgery the most viable approach for fistula repair. One surgical procedure which offers adequate repair of lower and middle rectovaginal fistulas consists of interposition of a bulbocavernosus fat flap also called modified Martius flap. First described by Heinrich Martius in 1928, this approach has been continuously modified and adjusted over time and is used in the repair of various pelvic floor disorders. Overall success rates reported in the literature of the interposition of a Martius flap as an adjunct procedure in the surgical management of RVF are 65-100 %. We present a detailed description of the operation technique together with a discussion of the use of a dorsal-flapped modified Martius flap in the treatment of RVF.

Indexed as

birth traumadeliverygynecology

Identifiers

PMID25364031
PMCPMC4210382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.