Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25363872›Full record

ReviewAnnals of neurology2014

Neuroimaging biomarkers for Parkinson disease: facts and fantasy.

Joel S Perlmutter, Scott A Norris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The impact of dopamine DEuropean journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PET Imaging in Movement Disorders.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2018
    Review
  17. Diagnostic biomarkers for Parkinson's disease at a glance: where are we?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2018
    Review
  18. Distinct progression pattern of susceptibility MRI in the substantia nigra of Parkinson's patients.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joel S PerlmutterDepartments of Neurology, Radiology, Anatomy & Neurobiology, Occupational Therapy, and Physical Therapy, Washington University, St Louis, MO.
Scott A Norris

Funding

INVESTIGATIONS OF DEMENTIA IN PARKINSON DISEASER01NS075321 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, MEGHAN C, PERLMUTTER, JOEL SYNES · 2011 to 2021
$8.2M
Dystonia CoalitionU54NS065701 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINNAH, HYDER A · 2009 to 2014
$7.0M
MECHANISMS OF DEEP BRAIN STIMULATIONR01NS041509 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PERLMUTTER, JOEL SYNES · 2001 to 2015
$6.8M
VALIDATION OF NEUROIMAGING BIOMARKERS FOR NIGROSTRIATAL NEURONSR01NS058714 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PERLMUTTER, JOEL SYNES · 2008 to 2016
$4.4M
CARBOXYFULLERENE TREATMENT OF MPTP-INDUCED PARKINSONISMR01NS050425 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PERLMUTTER, JOEL SYNES · 2005 to 2009
$2.6M
Dystonia CoalitionU54TR001456 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINNAH, HYDER A · 2015 to 2016
$2.5M
Investigations of Dementia in Parkinson DiseaseRF1NS075321 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, MEGHAN C, PERLMUTTER, JOEL SYNES · 2023 to 2023
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001456NINDS NIH HHS NS050425NINDS NIH HHS NS058714NINDS NIH HHS NS075321NINDS NIH HHS NS41509NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS041509NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050425NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058714NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075321NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS075321NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this grand rounds, we focus on development, validation, and application of neuroimaging biomarkers for Parkinson disease (PD). We cover whether such biomarkers can be used to identify presymptomatic individuals (probably yes), provide a measure of PD severity (in a limited fashion, but frequently done poorly), investigate pathophysiology of parkinsonian disorders (yes, if done carefully), play a role in differential diagnosis of parkinsonism (not well), and investigate pathology underlying cognitive impairment (yes, in conjunction with postmortem data). Along the way, we clarify several issues about definitions of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints. The goal of this lecture is to provide a basis for interpreting current literature and newly proposed clinical tools in PD. In the end, one should be able to critically distinguish fact from fantasy.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrainCognition DisordersDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansNeuroimagingParkinson DiseaseBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25363872
PMCPMC4245400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.