Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25363391›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2014

Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of benign and suspicious adrenal lesions.

Jin Fan, Jie Tang, Jiabin Fang, Qiuyang Li, Enhui He, Jia Li, Yanqiu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adrenal Lesions: A Review of Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Point of care ultrasound in thoracic malignancy.Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Imaging features of adrenal masses.Insights into imaging · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [18F]FDG- PET/CT Imaging Spectrum of the Most Prevalent Adrenal Lesions.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jin FanDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army of China, Beijing, China (mainland).
Jie TangDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army of China, Beijing, China (mainland).
Jiabin FangDepartment of Hand Surgery, Yuquan Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Qiuyang LiDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army of China, Beijing, China (mainland).
Enhui HeDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army of China, Beijing, China (mainland).
Jia LiDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army of China, Beijing, China (mainland).
Yanqiu WangDepartment of Ultrasound, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army of China, Beijing, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to define the ultrasound imaging characteristics of adrenal tumors and to assess the performance of ultrasound in differentiating benign 'leave-alone' lesions from suspicious lesions. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe enrolled 882 patients in this study. The nature of each lesion was determined by histopathology. Ultrasound finding of each lesion was compared with its corresponding histopathologic result. The final study group consisted of 911 adrenal masses in 882 patients. All images were reviewed by 2 experienced investigators in a double blind manner.

resultsThere were 553 adenomas identified in the study, which constituted 60.70% of the lesions. There were 161 pheochromocytomas (17.67%), 49 myelolipomas (5.38%), 39 cysts (4.28%), 37 metastasis (4.06%), 35 ganglioneuromas (3.84%), 22 lymphomas (2.41%), and 15 cortical carcinomas (1.65%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasound-based diagnosis were 89%, 99%, and 93.9%, respectively. A positive predictive value of 90.9% and a negative predictive value of 94.2% were obtained in this study.

conclusionsThis large-sample study showed that ultrasound was a reliable method in differentiating benign 'leave-alone' lesions from suspicious lesions.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID25363391
PMCPMC4228948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.