Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25363205›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2015

Dual antiangiogenic inhibition: a phase I dose escalation and expansion trial targeting VEGF-A and VEGFR in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Gerald S Falchook, Jennifer J Wheler, Aung Naing, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Siqing Fu, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, David S Hong, Filip Janku, Ralph Zinner, Yunfang Jiang and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gerald S FalchookSarah Cannon Research Institute at HealthONE, Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center, 1800 Williams Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO, 80218, USA, gerald.falchook@scresearch.net.
Jennifer J Wheler
Aung Naing
Sarina A Piha-Paul
Siqing Fu
Apostolia M Tsimberidou
David S Hong
Filip Janku
Ralph Zinner
Yunfang Jiang
Mei Huang
Quan Lin
Kristin Parkhurst
Razelle Kurzrock
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMoores Cancer CenterPresbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Paul Calabresi Clinical Oncology AwardK12CA088084 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI David S. Hong, Scott Kopetz · 2000 to 2026
$14.0M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA088084NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAngiogenesis plays a pivotal role in tumor growth and metastasis. Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), combined with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A), would vertically inhibit VEGF/VEGFR signaling. A phase I trial was performed to assess safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and clinical correlates. EXPERIMENTAL

designPatients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy were eligible. In cohorts of escalating doses, patients received sorafenib daily for 28 days and bevacizumab every two weeks. Clinical correlates included VEGF polymorphisms. Expansion cohorts of responding tumor types were enrolled.

resultsOne hundred fifteen patients were treated, and the MTD was identified as 200 mg twice daily sorafenib and 5 mg/kg bevacizumab every two weeks. Median number of prior therapies was four. Twenty-nine patients (25 %) achieved stable disease ≥6 months; six patients (5 %) achieved a partial response (total SD ≥ 6 months/PR=35 (30 %)). 76 patients (66 %) experienced adverse events of grade 2 or higher, most commonly hand and foot syndrome (n = 27, 24 %) and hypertension (n = 24, 21 %). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in eight patients (7 %), and 45 patients (39 %) required dose reduction for toxicity. Grade 3 and 4 hypertension was associated with longer time to treatment failure, overall survival, and higher response rate.

conclusionsCombination sorafenib and bevacizumab was well-tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasmsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorSorafenibTumor Suppressor Protein p53Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID25363205
PMCPMC4477529
OpenAlexW1978670801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.