ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2015
Review of race/ethnicity in non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants clinical trials.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Race/Ethnicity With Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II.JAMA cardiology · 2018Trial
- Racial and ethnic disparities in the management of risk factors in individuals with atrial fibrillation: A narrative review.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of NOAC in Very Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Data From the Korean National Health Insurance Cohort Registry.Korean circulation journal · 2024Article
- Being precise with anticoagulation to reduce adverse drug reactions: are we there yet?The pharmacogenomics journal · 2024Review
- Race/Ethnicity and Sex-Related Differences in Direct Oral Anticoagulant Initiation in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study of Medicare Data.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2020Article
- Rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment and prevention of recurrence of venous thromboembolism in African American patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.Thrombosis journal · 2020Article
- Genetic determinants of dabigatran safety (CES1 gene rs2244613 polymorphism) in the Russian population: multi-ethnic analysis.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Quality of anticoagulation control and hemorrhage risk among African American and European American warfarin users.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2017Article
- Review of venous thromboembolism and race: the generalizability of treatment guidelines for high-risk populations.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have advantages relative to traditional vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and represents an important advance in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Yet it is unclear whether the clinical trials evaluating these agents were inclusive of diverse populations. To assess the inclusion and reporting of race and ethnicity in clinical trials of NOACs across disease states including, atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and acute coronary syndromes, we queried PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for trials of NOACs between 2007 and 2013. We determined the reporting rate and inclusion of the following ethnic groups: whites, blacks, Asians, and Hispanics. We reviewed data from 30 randomized clinical trials of NOACs that enrolled 184,414 patients. Among these trials, 21 (70%) reported race/ethnicity data in the primary manuscript or on ClinicalTrials.gov. Principal investigators provided race/ethnicity data for two additional trials. Enrollment by race included: 109,729 (75.2%) white, 20,901 (14.3%) Asian, 5,718 (3.9%) Hispanic, and 2,941 (2.0%) black. Hispanic ethnicity was only reported in 10 trials. The major clinical trials of NOACs inconsistently reported race/ethnicity and overall black and Hispanic patient enrollment was poor. As such, the relative safety and efficacy of NOACs in minority populations remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25362508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.