Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25362243›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2015

Crowdsourced analysis of clinical trial data to predict amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression.

Robert Küffner, Neta Zach, Raquel Norel, Johann Hawe, David Schoenfeld, Liuxia Wang, Guang Li, Lilly Fang, Lester Mackey, Orla Hardiman and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.

Robert Küffner1] Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany. [2] Department of Informatics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Neta ZachPrize4Life, Tel Aviv, Israel and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Raquel NorelIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA.ORCID 0000000177374172
Johann HaweDepartment of Informatics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
David Schoenfeld1] MGH Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Liuxia WangSentrana Inc., Washington, DC, USA.
Guang LiSentrana Inc., Washington, DC, USA.
Lilly FangLatham&Watkins LLP, Silicon Valley, California, USA.
Lester MackeyDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Orla HardimanDepartment of Neuroscience, Beaumont Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Merit CudkowiczNeurological Clinical Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexander ShermanNeurological Clinical Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.
Gokhan ErtaylanLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch/Alzette, Luxembourg.
Moritz Grosse-WentrupMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Torsten HothornInstitute of Social- and Preventive Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jules van LigtenbergOrca XL Problem Solvers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jakob H MackeMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Tübingen, Germany.
Timm MeyerMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernhard SchölkopfMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Linh TranBerkeley School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Rubio VaughanOrca XL Problem Solvers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gustavo StolovitzkyIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA.
Melanie L Leitner1] Prize4Life, Tel Aviv, Israel and Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [2] ALS Innovation Hub, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems · DEIBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center · USBerkeley Public Health Division · USBiogen (United States) · USHelmholtz Zentrum München · DELatham & Watkins (United States) · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · DEPrize4Life · USStanford University · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Luxembourg · LUUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease with substantial heterogeneity in its clinical presentation. This makes diagnosis and effective treatment difficult, so better tools for estimating disease progression are needed. Here, we report results from the DREAM-Phil Bowen ALS Prediction Prize4Life challenge. In this crowdsourcing competition, competitors developed algorithms for the prediction of disease progression of 1,822 ALS patients from standardized, anonymized phase 2/3 clinical trials. The two best algorithms outperformed a method designed by the challenge organizers as well as predictions by ALS clinicians. We estimate that using both winning algorithms in future trial designs could reduce the required number of patients by at least 20%. The DREAM-Phil Bowen ALS Prediction Prize4Life challenge also identified several potential nonstandard predictors of disease progression including uric acid, creatinine and surprisingly, blood pressure, shedding light on ALS pathobiology. This analysis reveals the potential of a crowdsourcing competition that uses clinical trial data for accelerating ALS research and development.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCrowdsourcingAlgorithmsAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDisease ProgressionHumans

Identifiers

PMID25362243
OpenAlexW2124885415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.