Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25362171›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2014

Patient-specific modelling of cardiac electrophysiology in heart-failure patients.

Mark Potse, Dorian Krause, Wilco Kroon, Romina Murzilli, Stefano Muzzarelli, François Regoli, Enrico Caiani, Frits W Prinzen, Rolf Krause, Angelo Auricchio

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. 25 years of basic and translational science in EP Europace: novel insights into arrhythmia mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Space-time shape uncertainties in the forward and inverse problem of electrocardiography.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. GEASI: Geodesic-based earliest activation sites identification in cardiac models.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  14. Reconstruction of three-dimensional biventricular activation based on the 12-lead electrocardiogram via patient-specific modelling.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Mark PotseCenter for Computational Medicine in Cardiology, Faculty of Informatics, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland Inria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest, 33405 Talence CEDEX, France mark@potse.nl.
Dorian KrauseInstitute of Computational Science, Faculty of Informatics, Università della Svizzera italiana, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland.
Wilco KroonInstitute of Computational Science, Faculty of Informatics, Università della Svizzera italiana, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland.
Romina MurzilliDivision of Cardiology, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland.
Stefano MuzzarelliDivision of Cardiology, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland.
François RegoliDivision of Cardiology, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland.
Enrico CaianiDepartment of Electronics, Information, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Frits W PrinzenCenter for Computational Medicine in Cardiology, Faculty of Informatics, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rolf KrauseCenter for Computational Medicine in Cardiology, Faculty of Informatics, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland Institute of Computational Science, Faculty of Informatics, Università della Svizzera italiana, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland.
Angelo AuricchioCenter for Computational Medicine in Cardiology, Faculty of Informatics, Università della Svizzera italiana, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland Division of Cardiology, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, 6904 Lugano, Switzerland.
Epatocentro Ticino · CHUniversità della Svizzera italiana · CHMaastricht University · NLPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLeft-ventricular (LV) conduction disturbances are common in heart-failure patients and a left bundle-branch block (LBBB) electrocardiogram (ECG) type is often seen. The precise cause of this pattern is uncertain and is probably variable between patients, ranging from proximal interruption of the left bundle branch to diffuse distal conduction disease in the working myocardium. Using realistic numerical simulation methods and patient-tailored model anatomies, we investigated different hypotheses to explain the observed activation order on the LV endocardium, electrogram morphologies, and ECG features in two patients with heart failure and LBBB ECG. METHODS AND

resultsVentricular electrical activity was simulated using reaction-diffusion models with patient-specific anatomies. From the simulated action potentials, ECGs and cardiac electrograms were computed by solving the bidomain equation. Model parameters such as earliest activation sites, tissue conductivity, and densities of ionic currents were tuned to reproduce the measured signals. Electrocardiogram morphology and activation order could be matched simultaneously. Local electrograms matched well at some sites, but overall the measured waveforms had deeper S-waves than the simulated waveforms.

conclusionTuning a reaction-diffusion model of the human heart to reproduce measured ECGs and electrograms is feasible and may provide insights in individual disease characteristics that cannot be obtained by other means.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, CardiovascularAction PotentialsAgedBundle-Branch BlockElectrocardiographyElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHeart FailureHeart RateHumansMaleNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedPredictive Value of TestsVentricular Function, LeftComputer modelsConduction disordersHeart failureLeft bundle-branch block

Identifiers

PMID25362171
PMCPMC4217520
OpenAlexW2170990019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.