Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25361952›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2014

A functional and evolutionary perspective on transcription factor binding in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Ken S Heyndrickx, Jan Van de Velde, Congmao Wang, Detlef Weigel, Klaas Vandepoele

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Annual review of plant biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ken S HeyndrickxDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5831-0536
Jan Van de VeldeDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-1266
Congmao WangDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2114-7963
Klaas VandepoeleDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Gent, Belgium Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Gent, Belgium klaas.vandepoele@psb.vib-ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4790-2725
Ghent University · BEMax Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms underlying gene regulation is paramount to comprehend the translation from genotype to phenotype. The two are connected by gene expression, and it is generally thought that variation in transcription factor (TF) function is an important determinant of phenotypic evolution. We analyzed publicly available genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments for 27 TFs in Arabidopsis thaliana and constructed an experimental network containing 46,619 regulatory interactions and 15,188 target genes. We identified hub targets and highly occupied target (HOT) regions, which are enriched for genes involved in development, stimulus responses, signaling, and gene regulatory processes in the currently profiled network. We provide several lines of evidence that TF binding at plant HOT regions is functional, in contrast to that in animals, and not merely the result of accessible chromatin. HOT regions harbor specific DNA motifs, are enriched for differentially expressed genes, and are often conserved across crucifers and dicots, even though they are not under higher levels of purifying selection than non-HOT regions. Distal bound regions are under purifying selection as well and are enriched for a chromatin state showing regulation by the Polycomb repressive complex. Gene expression complexity is positively correlated with the total number of bound TFs, revealing insights in the regulatory code for genes with different expression breadths. The integration of noncanonical and canonical DNA motif information yields new hypotheses on cobinding and tethering between specific TFs involved in flowering and light regulation.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBase SequenceBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDatabases, GeneticDNA, PlantEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingModels, GeneticNucleotide MotifsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein BindingArabidopsis ProteinsDNA, PlantTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25361952
PMCPMC4247581
OpenAlexW2085055961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.