ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014
Effect of circulating tumor cells combined with negative enrichment and CD45-FISH identification in diagnosis, therapy monitoring and prognosis of primary lung cancer.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Role of circulating tumor cells in diagnosis of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Pooled it
- The diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Comprehensive Liquid Biopsy Approaches for the Clinical Management of Lung Cancer Using Multiple Biological Matrices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cell measurement in the peripheral blood of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2023Article
- Combined measurement of circulating tumor cell counts and serum tumor marker levels enhances the screening efficiency for malignant versus benign pulmonary nodules.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- Clinical significance of circulating tumour cells and tumour marker detection in the chemotherapeutic evaluation of advanced colorectal cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022Article
- The Number of Intraoperative Intestinal Venous Circulating Tumor Cells Is a Prognostic Factor for Colorectal Cancer Patients.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in predicating the outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2022Article
- CTCs detection from intraoperative salvaged blood in RCC-IVC thrombus patients by negative enrichment and iFISH identification: a preliminary study.BMC urology · 2021Article
- Malignancy Prediction Capacity and Possible Prediction Model of Circulating Tumor Cells for Suspicious Pulmonary Lesions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Cell Surface Vimentin Positive Circulating Tumor Cells as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Lung Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Significant diagnostic value of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Epithelial-mesenchymal transition may be involved in the immune evasion of circulating gastric tumor cells via downregulation of ULBP1.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Circulating Tumor Cells as a Tool of Minimal Residual Disease Can Predict Lung Cancer Recurrence: A longitudinal, Prospective Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Circulating tumor cells as a new predictive and prognostic factor in patients with small cell lung cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells and tumor markers in the diagnosis of lung cancer.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Correlation of pulmonary venous circulating tumor cells with clinicopathological parameters in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2019Article
- Analysis of risk factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Prognostic impact of circulating tumor cells in patients with ampullary cancer.Journal of cellular physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are valuable for diagnosis, monitoring therapy and prognosis in primary lung cancer. Herein, we evaluated the clinical significance of lung cancer CTCs in this study. Detection of CTCs was performed using epithelial cell adhesion molecule-independent enrichment and CD45 fluorescence in situ hybridization detection. CTCs ≥ 2/3.2 mL were considered as positive. The positive rates in primary lung cancer, benign lung disease and healthy control groups were 84, 0 and 4.2 %. CTCs count was significantly higher in lung cancer patients than healthy controls and benign lung disease, with an area under ROC curve of 0.917 (95 % confidence interval 0.855-0.979; p = 0.000) between lung cancer and nonmalignant diseases. CTCs count significantly increased with an increase in pathological stage with mean count of 2.3 ± 2.6 (stage I-II), 3.5 ± 3.3 (stage III) and 4.5 ± 4.3 (stage IV), respectively. The positive detection rate of CTCs for primary lung cancer diagnosis was higher than serum tumor markers. In total, 25 metastasis lung cancer patients participated in the follow-up. Changes in CTCs count after two cycles of chemotherapy were consistent with radiographic appearance. Moreover, CTCs count was better than serum tumor markers for monitoring chemotherapy response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.05, 3.25 and 8.348 months (p < 0.05) in group in which post-treatment CTCs count was increased, unchanged and decreased, respectively. Furthermore, PFS in patients whose post-treatment CTCs count increased or were unchanged accompanied by a baseline CTCs count ≥3 was significantly shorter than those whose post-treatment CTCs count decreased or was unchanged accompanied with baseline value C < 3 (1.85 vs. 8.22 months, p = 0.000) [Corrected]. Therefore, CTCs are a reproducible indicator of disease status that may be superior to imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25361883What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.