Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25361530›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2014

Prerequisites for sustainable care improvement using the reflective team as a work model.

Lise-Lotte Jonasson, Gunilla Carlsson, Maria Nyström

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lise-Lotte JonassonAcademy of Care, Working Life and Social Welfare, University of Boras, Boras, Sweden; Lise-Lotte.Jonasson@hb.se.
Gunilla CarlssonAcademy of Care, Working Life and Social Welfare, University of Boras, Boras, Sweden.
Maria NyströmAcademy of Care, Working Life and Social Welfare, University of Boras, Boras, Sweden.
University of Borås · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several work models for care improvement have been developed in order to meet the requirement for evidence-based care. This study examines a work model for reflection, entitled the reflective team (RT). The main idea behind RTs is that caring skills exist among those who work closest to the patients. The team leader (RTL) encourages sustainable care improvement, rooted in research and proven experience, by using a lifeworld perspective to stimulate further reflection and a developmental process leading to research-based caring actions within the team. In order to maintain focus, it is important that the RTL has a clear idea of what sustainable care improvement means, and what the prerequisites are for such improvement. The aim of the present study is, therefore, to explore the prerequisites for improving sustainable care, seeking to answer how RTLs perceive these and use RTs for concrete planning. Nine RTLs were interviewed, and their statements were phenomenographically analysed. The analysis revealed three separate qualitative categories, which describe personal, interpersonal, and structural aspects of the prerequisites. In the discussion, these categories are compared with previous research on reflection, and the conclusion is reached that the optimal conditions for RTs to work, when focussed on sustainable care improvement, occur when the various aspects of the prerequisites are intertwined and become a natural part of the reflective work.

Indexed as

AdultDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based NursingFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsPatient Care TeamQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedencare improvementlifeworldphenomenographyphenomenonReflective teamsustainability

Identifiers

PMID25361530
PMCPMC4216387
OpenAlexW1987431606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.