Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25360397›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Psychologie2014

Reevaluating the placebo effect in medical practice.

Luana Colloca, Wayne B Jonas, John Killen, Franklin G Miller, David Shurtleff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The Effects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. [Treatment expectations for postoperative pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The 4-month effect ofJournal of education and health promotion · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Clinical Use of Placebo Effects in Patients With Pain Disorders.International review of neurobiology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luana Colloca *National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Wayne B Jonas *Samueli Institute, 1737 King Street, Alexandria, VA, USA.
John Killen *National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Franklin G Miller *Clinical Center, Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
David Shurtleff *National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USSamueli Institute · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AT999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent findings on placebo research corroborate the evidence that the placebo effect represents a promising model to shed new light on the brain-mind-body interactions. In particular, this research has partially elucidated the role of how patients' expectations and the quality of physician-patient communication can influence the efficacy of interventions and overall clinical outcomes. Accordingly, the study of the placebo effect should be incorporated in the core clinical practice curriculum of all health practitioners. While the growing knowledge of the placebo effect points to it as an irreducible primary reality of the medical sciences, an ethical analysis aimed at avoiding the misuse of placebos is needed, while maximizing the opportunity for beneficial placebo effects.

Indexed as

CommunicationEthicsExpectationsPolicy

Identifiers

PMID25360397
PMCPMC4211281
OpenAlexW2110110418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.