Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25360347›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference2012

Statistical Relational Learning to Predict Primary Myocardial Infarction from Electronic Health Records.

Jeremy C Weiss, David Page, Peggy L Peissig, Sriraam Natarajan, Catherine McCarty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated Family Histories Significantly Improve Risk Prediction in an EHR.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeremy C WeissUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison 1300 University Ave, Madison,WI {jcweiss,page}@biostat.wisc.edu.
David PageUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison 1300 University Ave, Madison,WI {jcweiss,page}@biostat.wisc.edu.
Peggy L PeissigMarshfield Clinic Research Foundation 1000 North Oak Ave, Marshfield,WI peissig@mcrf.mfldclin.edu.
Sriraam NatarajanWake Forest University Baptist Medical Center Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC snataraj@wakehealth.edu.
Catherine McCartyEssentia Institute of Rural Health 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, MN cmccarty@eirh.org.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Machine Learning for Identifying Adverse Drug EventsR01GM097618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CALDWELL, MICHAEL DEFOIX, HANSEN, RICHARD A. · 2011 to 2018
$3.8M
Secure Sharing of Clinical History & Genetic Data: Empowering Predictive Pers. MeR01LM011028 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PAGE, CHARLES DAVID · 2011 to 2014
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097618NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011028NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) are an emerging relational domain with large potential to improve clinical outcomes. We apply two statistical relational learning (SRL) algorithms to the task of predicting primary myocardial infarction. We show that one SRL algorithm, relational functional gradient boosting, outperforms propositional learners particularly in the medically-relevant high recall region. We observe that both SRL algorithms predict outcomes better than their propositional analogs and suggest how our methods can augment current epidemiological practices.

Identifiers

PMID25360347
PMCPMC4211289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.