Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25360307›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2014

Clinical features of constipation in general practice in Italy.

Carmelo Cottone, Cesare Tosetti, Giuseppe Disclafani, Enzo Ubaldi, Rosanna Cogliandro, Vincenzo Stanghellini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmelo CottoneItalian College of General Practitioners (SIMG), Palermo, Italy.
Cesare TosettiItalian College of General Practitioners (SIMG), Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe DisclafaniItalian College of General Practitioners (SIMG), Palermo, Italy.
Enzo UbaldiItalian College of General Practitioners (SIMG), Ascoli Piceno, Italy.
Rosanna CogliandroDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vincenzo StanghelliniDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Società Italiana di Medicina Generale · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinition and diagnosis of constipation remain challenging, partly due to different perceptions of the disease by doctors and patients.

aimTo evaluate prevalence and features of constipation among individuals seen in general practice, by comparing different diagnostic instruments.

methodsStandardized questionnaires and the Bristol stool form scale were distributed to all subjects attending 10 general practitioners for any reason in a 2-week period. The questionnaires investigated constipation defined according to: (1) self-perception (yes/no); (2) a visual analogue scale; (3) Rome III Criteria.

resultsThe prevalence of constipation in 1306 subjects (790 female, 516 male) resulted: (1) 34% self-reported; (2) 28% by visual analogue scale; (3) 24% by Rome Criteria. Constipation was more frequent in females. A high frequency of symptoms of obstructed defecations was observed with differences among patients with self-reported constipation with or without Bristol stool type 1-2.

conclusionsPrevalence of constipation among individuals attending their GP ranges between 24 and 34%, according to the different definitions adopted. Symptoms of obstructed defecations are frequent. The combination of self-evaluation and the Bristol stool type scale is potentially useful to identify subgroups of patients with different clinical features in general practice.

Indexed as

Constipationepidemiologygeneral practicequestionnaireRome criteria

Identifiers

PMID25360307
PMCPMC4212453
OpenAlexW2112697086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.