Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25360276›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2014

Abiotic stress QTL in lettuce crop-wild hybrids: comparing greenhouse and field experiments.

Yorike Hartman, Danny A P Hooftman, Brigitte Uwimana, M Eric Schranz, Clemens C M van de Wiel, Marinus J M Smulders, Richard G F Visser, Richard W Michelmore, Peter H van Tienderen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Influence of Insolation on the Efficiency of NOWater, air, and soil pollution · 2018
    Article
  10. Genetic Architecture of Charcoal Rot (Frontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yorike HartmanInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Universiteit van Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Danny A P HooftmanInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Universiteit van Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; NERC, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford, UK.
Brigitte UwimanaWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M Eric SchranzInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Universiteit van Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clemens C M van de WielWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marinus J M SmuldersWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Richard G F VisserWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Richard W MichelmoreGenome Center and Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, California.
Peter H van TienderenInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Universiteit van Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of stress-tolerant crops is an increasingly important goal of current crop breeding. A higher abiotic stress tolerance could increase the probability of introgression of genes from crops to wild relatives. This is particularly relevant to the discussion on the risks of new GM crops that may be engineered to increase abiotic stress resistance. We investigated abiotic stress QTL in greenhouse and field experiments in which we subjected recombinant inbred lines from a cross between cultivated Lactuca sativa cv. Salinas and its wild relative L. serriola to drought, low nutrients, salt stress, and aboveground competition. Aboveground biomass at the end of the rosette stage was used as a proxy for the performance of plants under a particular stress. We detected a mosaic of abiotic stress QTL over the entire genome with little overlap between QTL from different stresses. The two QTL clusters that were identified reflected general growth rather than specific stress responses and colocated with clusters found in earlier studies for leaf shape and flowering time. Genetic correlations across treatments were often higher among different stress treatments within the same experiment (greenhouse or field), than among the same type of stress applied in different experiments. Moreover, the effects of the field stress treatments were more correlated with those of the greenhouse competition treatments than to those of the other greenhouse stress experiments, suggesting that competition rather than abiotic stress is a major factor in the field. In conclusion, the introgression risk of stress tolerance (trans-)genes under field conditions cannot easily be predicted based on genomic background selection patterns from controlled QTL experiments in greenhouses, especially field data will be needed to assess potential (negative) ecological effects of introgression of these transgenes into wild relatives.

Indexed as

Abiotic stresscrop–wild hybridsenvironmental risk assessmentLactucaQTLTransgene

Identifiers

PMID25360276
PMCPMC4203288
OpenAlexW2133396767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.