Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25360131›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

Probing the diversity of chloromethane-degrading bacteria by comparative genomics and isotopic fractionation.

Thierry Nadalig, Markus Greule, Françoise Bringel, Frank Keppler, Stéphane Vuilleumier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microbial oxidation of atmospheric trace gases.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thierry NadaligUniversité de Strasbourg, Equipe Adaptations et Interactions Microbiennes dans l'Environnement, Unitès Mixtes de Recherche 7156 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Génétique Moléculaire, Génomique, Microbiologie Strasbourg, France.
Markus GreuleInstitute of Earth Sciences, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
Françoise BringelUniversité de Strasbourg, Equipe Adaptations et Interactions Microbiennes dans l'Environnement, Unitès Mixtes de Recherche 7156 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Génétique Moléculaire, Génomique, Microbiologie Strasbourg, France.
Frank KepplerInstitute of Earth Sciences, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
Stéphane VuilleumierUniversité de Strasbourg, Equipe Adaptations et Interactions Microbiennes dans l'Environnement, Unitès Mixtes de Recherche 7156 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Génétique Moléculaire, Génomique, Microbiologie Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chloromethane (CH3Cl) is produced on earth by a variety of abiotic and biological processes. It is the most important halogenated trace gas in the atmosphere, where it contributes to ozone destruction. Current estimates of the global CH3Cl budget are uncertain and suggest that microorganisms might play a more important role in degrading atmospheric CH3Cl than previously thought. Its degradation by bacteria has been demonstrated in marine, terrestrial, and phyllospheric environments. Improving our knowledge of these degradation processes and their magnitude is thus highly relevant for a better understanding of the global budget of CH3Cl. The cmu pathway, for chloromethane utilisation, is the only microbial pathway for CH3Cl degradation elucidated so far, and was characterized in detail in aerobic methylotrophic Alphaproteobacteria. Here, we reveal the potential of using a two-pronged approach involving a combination of comparative genomics and isotopic fractionation during CH3Cl degradation to newly address the question of the diversity of chloromethane-degrading bacteria in the environment. Analysis of available bacterial genome sequences reveals that several bacteria not yet known to degrade CH3Cl contain part or all of the complement of cmu genes required for CH3Cl degradation. These organisms, unlike bacteria shown to grow with CH3Cl using the cmu pathway, are obligate anaerobes. On the other hand, analysis of the complete genome of the chloromethane-degrading bacterium Leisingera methylohalidivorans MB2 showed that this bacterium does not contain cmu genes. Isotope fractionation experiments with L. methylohalidivorans MB2 suggest that the unknown pathway used by this bacterium for growth with CH3Cl can be differentiated from the cmu pathway. This result opens the prospect that contributions from bacteria with the cmu and Leisingera-type pathways to the atmospheric CH3Cl budget may be teased apart in the future.

Indexed as

bacteriachloromethanecomparative genomicsdiversityisotope fractionation

Identifiers

PMID25360131
PMCPMC4197683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.