Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25359929›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Potency of transgenic effectors for neurogenetic manipulation in Drosophila larvae.

Dennis Pauls, Alina von Essen, Radostina Lyutova, Lena van Giesen, Ronny Rosner, Christian Wegener, Simon G Sprecher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Selective octopaminergic tuning of mushroom body circuits during memory formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Octopamine receptors inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Triggering and modulation of a complex behavior by a single peptidergic command neuron inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Structural and Functional Synaptic Plasticity Induced by Convergent Synapse Loss in theThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Synaptic Plasticity Induced by Differential Manipulation of Tonic and Phasic Motoneurons inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Two Pairs ofFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dennis PaulsNeurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany dennis.pauls@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8330-8120
Alina von EssenDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Radostina LyutovaNeurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany.
Lena van GiesenDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Ronny RosnerDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-University Marburg, D-35037 Marburg, Germany Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Christian WegenerNeurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-3567
Simon G SprecherDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic manipulations of neuronal activity are a cornerstone of studies aimed to identify the functional impact of defined neurons for animal behavior. With its small nervous system, rapid life cycle, and genetic amenability, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster provides an attractive model system to study neuronal circuit function. In the past two decades, a large repertoire of elegant genetic tools has been developed to manipulate and study neural circuits in the fruit fly. Current techniques allow genetic ablation, constitutive silencing, or hyperactivation of neuronal activity and also include conditional thermogenetic or optogenetic activation or inhibition. As for all genetic techniques, the choice of the proper transgenic tool is essential for behavioral studies. Potency and impact of effectors may vary in distinct neuron types or distinct types of behavior. We here systematically test genetic effectors for their potency to alter the behavior of Drosophila larvae, using two distinct behavioral paradigms: general locomotor activity and directed, visually guided navigation. Our results show largely similar but not equal effects with different effector lines in both assays. Interestingly, differences in the magnitude of induced behavioral alterations between different effector lines remain largely consistent between the two behavioral assays. The observed potencies of the effector lines in aminergic and cholinergic neurons assessed here may help researchers to choose the best-suited genetic tools to dissect neuronal networks underlying the behavior of larval fruit flies.

Indexed as

TransgenesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterGene TargetingLarvaLocomotionOptogeneticseffector geneslight avoidancelocomotionoptogeneticsthermogenetics

Identifiers

PMID25359929
PMCPMC4286689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.