ReviewHerz2014
[Antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. Therapeutic strategies and treatment duration].
Review in Herz, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Besides percutaneous coronary interventions, antiplatelet drugs are of overwhelming importance for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). For ACS patients, the guidelines recommend treatment with acetylsalicylic acid and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist. The third generation P2Y12 receptor antagonists prasugrel and ticagrelor provide stronger platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and improve the clinical outcome in patients with ACS; however, it is still under discussion which P2Y12 antagonist fits best to which subgroup of ACS patients. This article summarizes current guidelines and antiplatelet treatment strategies for patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) ACS or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The information is mainly based on the recently published guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology on myocardial revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25359405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.