Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25359324›Full record

ReviewAnimal : an international journal of animal bioscience2015

Animal board invited review: advances in proteomics for animal and food sciences.

A M Almeida, A Bassols, E Bendixen, M Bhide, F Ceciliani, S Cristobal, P D Eckersall, K Hollung, F Lisacek, G Mazzucchelli and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Effect ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Proteomic Advances in Milk and Dairy Products.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 17 institutions in 15 countries.

A M Almeida1Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical, CVZ - Centro de Veterinária e Zootecnia,Av. Univ. Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa,Portugal.
A Bassols5Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Facultat de Veterinària,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès,Spain.
E Bendixen6Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics,Aarhus University,8000 Aarhus C,Denmark.
M Bhide7Laboratory of Biomedical Microbiology and Immunology,University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy,Komenskeho-73 Kosice,Slovakia.
F Ceciliani8Department of Veterinary Science and Public Health,Università di Milano,Via Celoria 10,20133 Milano,Italy.
S Cristobal9Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine,Division of Cell Biology, Faculty of Health Science,Linköping University,SE-581 85 Linköping,Sweden.
P D Eckersall11Institute of Biodiversity,Animal Health and Comparative Medicine,University of Glasgow,Garscube Estate,Glasgow G61 1QH,UK.
K Hollung12Nofima AS,PO Box 210,NO-1431 Aas,Norway.
F Lisacek13Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics,CMU - Rue Michel-Servet 1,1211 Geneva 4,Switzerland.
G Mazzucchelli14Mass Spectrometry Laboratory,GIGA-Research,Department of Chemistry,University of Liège,4000 Liège,Belgium.
M McLaughlin15Division of Veterinary Bioscience,School of Veterinary Medicine,University of Glasgow,Garscube Estate,Glasgow G61 1QH,UK.
I Miller16Institute of Medical Biochemistry,University of Veterinary Medicine,Veterinaerplatz 1,A-1210 Vienna,Austria.
J E Nally17National Animal Disease Center,Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit,Agricultural Research Service,United States Department of Agriculture,Ames,IA 50010,USA.
J Plowman18Food & Bio-Based Products,AgResearch,Lincoln Research Centre,Christchurch 8140,New Zealand.
J Renaut19Department of Environment and Agrobiotechnologies,Centre de Recherche Public - Gabriel Lippmann,41 rue du Brill,L-4422 Belvaux,Luxembourg.
P Rodrigues20CCMAR - Centre of Marine Sciences of Algarve,University of Algarve,Campus de Gambelas,8005-139 Faro,Portugal.
P Roncada21Department of Veterinary Science and Public Health,Istituto Sperimentale Italiano L. Spallanzani Milano,University of Milano,20133 Milano,Italy.
J Staric22Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory Clinic, Veterinary Faculty,University of Ljubljana,Gerbičeva 60,1000 Ljubljana,Slovenia.
R Turk23Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,University of Zagreb,Heinzelova 55,10000 Zagreb,Croatia.
University of Glasgow · GBAarhus University · DKAgResearch · NZFafo Foundation · NOInstituto de Investigação Científica Tropical · PTIstituto Sperimentale Italiano Lazzaro Spallanzani · ITLinköping University · SENational Animal Disease Center · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Algarve · PTUniversity of Liège · BEUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Veterinary Medicine in Košice · SKUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal production and health (APH) is an important sector in the world economy, representing a large proportion of the budget of all member states in the European Union and in other continents. APH is a highly competitive sector with a strong emphasis on innovation and, albeit with country to country variations, on scientific research. Proteomics (the study of all proteins present in a given tissue or fluid - i.e. the proteome) has an enormous potential when applied to APH. Nevertheless, for a variety of reasons and in contrast to disciplines such as plant sciences or human biomedicine, such potential is only now being tapped. To counter such limited usage, 6 years ago we created a consortium dedicated to the applications of Proteomics to APH, specifically in the form of a Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action, termed FA1002--Proteomics in Farm Animals: www.cost-faproteomics.org. In 4 years, the consortium quickly enlarged to a total of 31 countries in Europe, as well as Israel, Argentina, Australia and New Zealand. This article has a triple purpose. First, we aim to provide clear examples on the applications and benefits of the use of proteomics in all aspects related to APH. Second, we provide insights and possibilities on the new trends and objectives for APH proteomics applications and technologies for the years to come. Finally, we provide an overview and balance of the major activities and accomplishments of the COST Action on Farm Animal Proteomics. These include activities such as the organization of seminars, workshops and major scientific conferences, organization of summer schools, financing Short-Term Scientific Missions (STSMs) and the generation of scientific literature. Overall, the Action has attained all of the proposed objectives and has made considerable difference by putting proteomics on the global map for animal and veterinary researchers in general and by contributing significantly to reduce the East-West and North-South gaps existing in the European farm animal research. Future activities of significance in the field of scientific research, involving members of the action, as well as others, will likely be established in the future.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryFood TechnologyProteomeProteomicsAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimal WelfareAquacultureArgentinaAustraliaDairy ProductsEuropeEuropean UnionIsraelMeatProteome

Identifiers

PMID25359324
PMCPMC4301196
OpenAlexW2154741636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.