ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2015
Radiofrequency sacroplasty (RFS) for the treatment of osteoporotic insufficiency fractures.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Balloon-assisted sacroplasty as a successful procedure for osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures after failure of the conservative treatment.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Comparison of the 18-month outcome after the treatment of osteoporotic insufficiency fractures by means of balloon sacroplasty (BSP) and radiofrequency sacroplasty (RFS) in comparison: a prospective randomised study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017Trial
- Evaluating Treatment Outcomes for Pelvic Insufficiency Fractures: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: Treatment Modalities and Outcomes.Cureus · 2023Review
- Comparative outcome of different treatment options for fragility fractures of the sacrum.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Cervical subtotal discectomy prosthesis validated in non-human primate model: A novel artificial cervical disc replacement concept?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- 'XX'-Sacroplasty: A Novel Technique for Management of "H-Type" Sacral Insufficiency Fractures.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2022Article
- The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European spine journal, 2015.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectiveIn elderly patients with reduced bone quality, insufficiency fractures of the sacrum are relatively common and are typically accompanied by severe, disabling pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of cement augmentation by RFS, as well as to determine postinterventional leakages and present the patients' outcomes. MATERIAL AND
methodIn 20 patients (18 women, 2 men) with an average age of 80.4 (65-92) years, a fracture of the sacrum was detected by CT and MRI. Clinically manifest osteoporosis with QCT values of below 50 mg/ml was found in all patients. An initially performed conservative treatment over a period of 3 weeks did not achieve a satisfactory reduction in the severe, disabling pain. The cement augmentation was performed under CT guidance by means of RFS under intubation anaesthesia. A Jamshidi needle was advanced into the respective fracture zone in the sacrum from dorsal to ventral (short axis) or from lateral to medial transiliac (transiliac axis). After removing the inner needle, a flexible osteotome was inserted through the positioned hollow needle and used to extend the spongious space in the fracture zone and thus prepare a cavity for the cement filling. The highly viscous polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement, activated by radiofrequency, was then inserted into the prepared fracture zone through a substituted screw cannula. Cement filling was performed discontinuously under instrumental guidance at 1.3 ml/min under CT guidance. Cement leakages were determined in CT images and conventional X-rays on the day after the intervention. Pain was documented on a visual analogue scale (VAS) on the day before the intervention, on the second day, and after 6 and 12 months after the intervention. Additionally occurring complications were recorded, and the patients were asked to state how satisfied they were after 12 months.
resultsRFS was technically feasible in all patients. In the control CT scans and X-rays, sufficient cement distribution and interlocking with vital bone was found along the course of the fracture in the sacrum. 7.2 (4-9) ml of cement were inserted per fracture. Leakage could be ruled out. The mean pain score on the VAS was 8.8 ± 1.2 before the intervention, and a significant reduction in pain (p < 0.001) was seen on the second postoperative day, with an average value of 2.3 ± 0.7, which was stable at 2.2 ± 1.3 after 6 months and 2.1 ± 1.1 after 12 months. All of the patients could be fully re-mobilised and discharged back home. A high level of patient satisfaction was found after 12 months, with 18 of the 20 patients stating that they would undergo the intervention again. One patient died of a stroke, another of cancer over the course.
conclusionAs a minimally invasive procedure, RFS is an effective and safe method of treatment for rapid, significant and sustained pain reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.