Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014
Prediction accuracy of a novel dynamic structure-function model for glaucoma progression.
Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study
African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (Formerly African Americans With Glaucoma Study)
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Usefulness of Assessing Glaucoma Progression With Postprocessed Visual Field Data.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Characterizing and quantifying the temporal relationship between structural and functional change in glaucoma.PloS one · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the external validity of a joint structure-function model for monitoring glaucoma progression.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A framework for assessing glaucoma progression using structural and functional indices jointly.PloS one · 2020Article
- [Structural endpoints for glaucoma studies].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019Review
- Clinical Prediction Performance of Glaucoma Progression Using a 2-Dimensional Continuous-Time Hidden Markov Model with Structural and Functional Measurements.Ophthalmology · 2018Observational
- Prediction Accuracy of the Dynamic Structure-Function Model for Glaucoma Progression Using Contrast Sensitivity Perimetry and Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.Journal of glaucoma · 2018Article
- Structure-function relationship comparison between retinal nerve fibre layer and Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width in glaucoma.International journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Article
- Observational
- Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchReview
- A Joint Bayesian Longitudinal Model for Macular Structure-Function Correlations in Glaucoma.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the prediction accuracy of a novel dynamic structure-function (DSF) model to monitor glaucoma progression.
methodsLongitudinal data of paired rim area (RA) and mean sensitivity (MS) from 220 eyes with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma enrolled in the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study or the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study were included. Rim area and MS were expressed as percent of mean normal based on an independent dataset of 91 healthy eyes. The DSF model uses centroids as estimates of the current state of the disease and velocity vectors as estimates of direction and rate of change over time. The first three visits were used to predict the fourth visit; the first four visits were used to predict the fifth visit, and so on up to the 11th visit. The prediction error (PE) was compared to that of ordinary least squares linear regression (OLSLR) using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsFor predictions at visit 4 to visit 7, the average PE for the DSF model was significantly lower than OLSLR by 1.19% to 3.42% of mean normal. No significant difference was observed for the predictions at visit 8 to visit 11. The DSF model had lower PE than OLSLR for 70% of eyes in predicting visit 4 and approximately 60% in predicting visits 5, 6, and 7.
conclusionsThe two models had similar prediction capabilities, and the DSF model performed better in shorter time series. The DSF model could be clinically useful when only limited follow-ups are available. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00221923, NCT00221897.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.