ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2015
Opinions about electronic cigarette use in smoke-free areas among U.S. Adults, 2012.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Risk Factors and Perceptions of E-Cigarette Use Among Selected Users in Johannesburg, South Africa.Journal of community health · 2021Article
- Public Support for E-Cigarette-related Policies among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.Tobacco use insights · 2020Article
- Article
- Regional Rural-Urban Differences in E-Cigarette Use and Reasons for Use in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2019Article
- U.S. Adult Attitudes About Electronic Vapor Product Use in Indoor Public Places.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Who are the smokers who never plan to quit and what do they think about the risks of using tobacco products?Addictive behaviors · 2018Article
- An exploratory analysis of adult daily smokers' experiences using e-cigarettes in smoke-free places.Tobacco induced diseases · 2018Article
- Pulmonary toxicity of e-cigarettes.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2017Review
- Restrictions on the use of e-cigarettes in public and private places-current practice and support among adults in Great Britain.European journal of public health · 2017Article
- Changing Perceptions of Harm of E-Cigarettes Among U.S. Adults, 2012-2015.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Article
- Use of electronic cigarettes in smoke-free environments.Tobacco control · 2017Article
- Support for e-cigarette policies: a survey of smokers and ex-smokers in Great Britain.Tobacco control · 2017Article
- Perceptions of harm from electronic-cigarette use among a sample of US Navy personnel.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2017Article
- Revisiting the Rise of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Using Search Query Surveillance.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016Article
- Perceived Harm of Secondhand Electronic Cigarette Vapors and Policy Support to Restrict Public Vaping: Results From a National Survey of US Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016Article
- Perceptions of Secondhand E-Cigarette Aerosol Among Twitter Users.Tobacco regulatory science · 2016Article
- Are e-cigarettes a gateway to smoking or a pathway to quitting?British dental journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn the United States, electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are currently unregulated, extensively marketed, and experiencing a rapid increase in use. The purpose of this study was to examine the opinions of U.S. adults about e-cigarette use in smoke-free public areas.
methodsData were obtained from the online HealthStyle survey administered to a probability sample of a nationally representative online panel. The study included 4,043U.S. adults, aged 18 years or older who responded to this question, "Do you think e-cigarette should be allowed to be used in public areas where tobacco smoking is prohibited?" Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to examine opinions on e-cigarette use in smoke-free areas by sex, age, race/ethnicity, household income, education, census region, and cigarette smoking status and e-cigarette awareness and ever use.
resultsOverall, about 40% of adults were uncertain whether e-cigarettes should be allowed in smoke-free areas, 37% opposed, while 23% favored their use in smoke-free public places. Multinomial logistic regression analyses showed that adults who were aware, ever used e-cigarettes, and current cigarette smokers were more likely to express an "in favor" opinion than adults who expressed an uncertain opinion (don't know).
conclusionOver 75% of U.S. adults reported uncertainty or disapproval of the use of e-cigarettes in smoke-free areas. Current cigarette smokers, adults aware or have ever used e-cigarettes were more supportive to exempting e-cigarettes from smoking restrictions. With impending regulation and the changing e-cigarette landscape, continued monitoring and research on public opinions about e-cigarette use in smoke-free places are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.