Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25357129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Differentiation of human umbilical cord matrix mesenchymal stem cells into neural-like progenitor cells and maturation into an oligodendroglial-like lineage.

Cristiana Leite, N Tatiana Silva, Sandrine Mendes, Andreia Ribeiro, Joana Paes de Faria, Tânia Lourenço, Francisco dos Santos, Pedro Z Andrade, Carla M P Cardoso, Margarida Vieira and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cell-Based Therapies for Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cofilin-1 Is a Mechanosensitive Regulator of Transcription.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cristiana LeiteBiocant - Technology Transfer Association, Biocant Park, Cantanhede, Portugal.
N Tatiana SilvaBiocant - Technology Transfer Association, Biocant Park, Cantanhede, Portugal.
Sandrine MendesBlood and Transplantation Center of Coimbra, Portuguese Institute of the Blood and Transplantation, Coimbra, Portugal.
Andreia RibeiroBlood and Transplantation Center of Coimbra, Portuguese Institute of the Blood and Transplantation, Coimbra, Portugal.
Joana Paes de FariaInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Porto, Portugal.
Tânia LourençoBiocant - Technology Transfer Association, Biocant Park, Cantanhede, Portugal.
Francisco dos SantosInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pedro Z AndradeInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Carla M P CardosoCrioestaminal Saúde e Tecnologia, S.A., Biocant Park, Cantanhede, Portugal.
Margarida VieiraCrioestaminal Saúde e Tecnologia, S.A., Biocant Park, Cantanhede, Portugal.
Artur PaivaBlood and Transplantation Center of Coimbra, Portuguese Institute of the Blood and Transplantation, Coimbra, Portugal.
Cláudia L da SilvaInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Joaquim M S CabralInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
João B RelvasInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Porto, Portugal.
Mário GrãosBiocant - Technology Transfer Association, Biocant Park, Cantanhede, Portugal.
Biocant · PTInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering · PTInstituto de Biologia Molecular e CelularUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are viewed as safe, readily available and promising adult stem cells, which are currently used in several clinical trials. Additionally, their soluble-factor secretion and multi-lineage differentiation capacities place MSCs in the forefront of stem cell types with expected near-future clinical applications. In the present work MSCs were isolated from the umbilical cord matrix (Wharton's jelly) of human umbilical cord samples. The cells were thoroughly characterized and confirmed as bona-fide MSCs, presenting in vitro low generation time, high proliferative and colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) capacity, typical MSC immunophenotype and osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation capacity. The cells were additionally subjected to an oligodendroglial-oriented step-wise differentiation protocol in order to test their neural- and oligodendroglial-like differentiation capacity. The results confirmed the neural-like plasticity of MSCs, and suggested that the cells presented an oligodendroglial-like phenotype throughout the differentiation protocol, in several aspects sharing characteristics common to those of bona-fide oligodendrocyte precursor cells and differentiated oligodendrocytes.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOligodendrogliaUmbilical CordWharton Jelly

Identifiers

PMID25357129
PMCPMC4214693
OpenAlexW2073023510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.