Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25357122›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Effectiveness of insecticide spraying and culling of dogs on the incidence of Leishmania infantum infection in humans: a cluster randomized trial in Teresina, Brazil.

Guilherme L Werneck, Carlos H N Costa, Fernando Aécio Amorim de Carvalho, Maria do Socorro Pires e Cruz, James H Maguire, Marcia C Castro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Vector and reservoir control for preventing leishmaniasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Knowledge mapping of risk mitigation measures against vector-borne diseases.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Safety Analysis ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Risk Profiles for Leishmania infantum Infection in Brazil.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guilherme L WerneckInstituto de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva (UFRJ) e Departamento de Epidemiologia, Instituto de Medicina Social/IMS, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Carlos H N CostaInstituto de Doenças Tropicais Nathan Portella and Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brasil.
Fernando Aécio Amorim de CarvalhoDepartamento de Bioquímica e Farmacologia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brasil.
Maria do Socorro Pires e CruzPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brasil.
James H MaguireDivision of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Marcia C CastroDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the effect of insecticide spraying for vector control and elimination of infected dogs on the incidence of human infection with L. infantum, a randomized community intervention trial was carried out in the city of Teresina, Brazil. METHODS/PRINCIPAL

findingsWithin each of ten localities in the city, four blocks were selected and randomized to 4 interventions: 1) spraying houses and animal pens with insecticide; 2) eliminating infected dogs; 3) combination of spraying and eliminating dogs, and 4) nothing. The main outcome is the incidence of infection assessed by the conversion of the Montenegro skin test (MST) after 18 months of follow-up in residents aged ≥ 1 year with no previous history of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Reactions were measured at 48-72 h, induration of ≥ 5 mm considered positive. Interventions were executed after the baseline interview and repeated 6 and 12 months later. The effects of each type of intervention scheme on the incidence of infection were assessed by calculating relative risks and 95% confidence intervals using Poisson population-averaged regression models with robust variance. Among the 1105 participants, 408 (37%) were MST positive at baseline. Of the 697 negatives, only 423 (61%) were reexamined at the end of the follow-up; 151 (36%) of them converted to a positive MST. Only dog culling had some statistically significant effect on reducing the incidence of infection, with estimates of effectiveness varying between 27% and 52%, depending on the type of analysis performed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In light of the continuous spread of VL in Brazil despite the large scale deployment of insecticide spraying and dog culling, the relatively low to moderate effectiveness of dog culling and the non-significant effect of insecticide spraying on the incidence of human infection, we conclude that there is an urgent need for revision of the Brazilian VL control program.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsLeishmania infantumAdultAnimalsBrazilDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHumansIncidenceInsecticidesLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleMiddle AgedInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID25357122
PMCPMC4214628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.