Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25357098›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2015

Oxygen targeting in preterm infants: a physiological interpretation.

S Lakshminrusimha, V Manja, B Mathew, G K Suresh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. LED light can falsify pulse oximetry readings via the stroboscopic effect.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Optimal Oxygen Targets in Term Lambs with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome and Pulmonary Hypertension.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Oxygen therapy in preterm infants with pulmonary hypertension.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S LakshminrusimhaDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo and University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
V ManjaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
B MathewDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo and University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
G K SureshDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA.

Funding

Optimal Oxygenation in Neonatal Lung InjuryR01HD072929 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Satyanarayana Lakshminrusimha · 2012 to 2026
$5.4M
NICHD NIH HHS 5 R01 HD072929NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials evaluating low-target oxygen saturation (SpO2:85% to 89%) vs high-target SpO2 (91% to 95%) have shown variable results regarding mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants. Because of the variation inherent to the accuracy of pulse oximeters, the unspecified location of probe placement, the intrinsic relationship between SpO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and between SaO2 and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) (differences in oxygen dissociation curves for fetal and adult hemoglobin), the two comparison groups could have been more similar than dissimilar. The SpO2 values were in the target range for a shorter period of time than intended due to practical and methodological constraints. So the studies did not truly compare 'target SpO2 ranges'. In spite of this overlap, some of the studies did find significant differences in mortality prior to discharge, necrotizing enterocolitis and severe retinopathy of prematurity. These differences could potentially be secondary to time spent beyond the target range (SpO2 <85 or >95%) and could be avoided with an intermediate but wider target SpO2 range (87% to 93%). In conclusion, significant uncertainty persists about the desired target range of SpO2 in extremely preterm infants. Further studies should focus on studying newer methods of assessing oxygenation and strategies to limit hypoxemia (<85% SpO2) and hyperoxemia (>95% SpO2).

Indexed as

Oxygen Inhalation TherapyHumansInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornOximetryOxygenRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSoftwareOxygen

Identifiers

PMID25357098
PMCPMC4281291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.