Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25356404›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2014

A randomized controlled phase II trial of riluzole in early multiple sclerosis.

Emmanuelle Waubant, Amir-Hadi Maghzi, Nisha Revirajan, Rebecca Spain, Laura Julian, Ellen M Mowry, Jacqueline Marcus, Shuang Liu, Chengshi Jin, Ari Green and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Modulating glutamate neurotransmission inFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Kynurenines and Mitochondrial Disturbances in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Glutamine antagonism attenuates physical and cognitive deficits in a model of MS.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuelle WaubantMS Center, Neurology Department, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California ; Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California.
Amir-Hadi MaghziMS Center, Neurology Department, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California.
Nisha RevirajanMS Center, Neurology Department, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California.
Rebecca SpainPortland VA Medical Center & Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon.
Laura JulianMS Center, Neurology Department, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California.
Ellen M MowryDepartment of Neurology, Hopkins MS Center Baltimore, Maryland.
Jacqueline MarcusMS Center, Neurology Department, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California.
Shuang LiuDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut.
Chengshi JinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California.
Ari GreenMS Center, Neurology Department, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California ; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California.
Charles E McCullochDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California.
Daniel PelletierDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, Connecticut.
University of California, San Francisco · USYale University · USPortland VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe evaluated the effect of riluzole versus placebo added to weekly IM interferon beta-1a in early multiple sclerosis (MS).

methodsThis is a randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of riluzole 50 mg twice daily in subjects with MS onset less than 1 year prior. Trial participation was up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was change in percent brain volume change. Secondary endpoints included changes in normalized gray and normal-appearing white matter volumes, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL), MS Functional Composite and Symbol Digit Modalities Test scores. Mixed model regression analysis was used to compare the changes over time between groups.

resultsForty-three subjects were randomized to study drug (22 riluzole, 21 placebo). Baseline characteristics were overall similar between groups except for older age (P = 0.042), higher normalized cerebrospinal fluid volume (P = 0.050), lower normalized gray matter volume (P = 0.14), and thinner RNFL (P = 0.043) in the riluzole group. In the primary analysis, percent brain volume change in the placebo group decreased at a rate of 0.49% per year whereas the riluzole group decreased by 0.86% per year (0.37% more per year; 95% CI -0.78, 0.024; P = 0.065). Although age did not influence the rate of brain volume decline, the difference between groups was attenuated after adjustment for baseline normalized gray matter and lesion volume (0.26% more per year in riluzole group; 95% CI -0.057, 0.014; P = 0.22). Analyses of secondary outcomes showed no differences between groups.

interpretationThis trial provides class 1 evidence that riluzole treatment does not meaningfully reduce brain atrophy progression in early MS.

Identifiers

PMID25356404
PMCPMC4184685
OpenAlexW2081436889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.