ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2014
Motor threshold predicts working memory performance in healthy humans.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of fampridine on working memory: a randomized controlled trial based on a genome-guided repurposing approach.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Utilizing resting motor threshold to predict cognitive function in drug-naive patients with major depressive disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Cognitive Impairment-Associated Risk Factors of Parkinson's Disease: A Hospital-Based Study in a Cohort of Upper Egypt Parkinson's Patients.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Reduced risk tolerance and cortical excitability following COVID-19 infection.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Long-interval intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex related to working memory in middle-aged adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Role of Cognitive Reserve in Alzheimer's Disease and Aging: A Multi-Modal Imaging Review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2018Review
- Have Standard Tests of Cognitive Function Been Misappropriated in the Study of Cognitive Enhancement?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Review
- Article
- Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of motor-evoked potential recruitment curves yields accurate and robust estimates.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive functions, such as working memory, depend on neuronal excitability in a distributed network of cortical regions. It is not known, however, if interindividual differences in cortical excitability are related to differences in working memory performance. In the present transcranial magnetic stimulation study, which included 188 healthy young subjects, we show that participants with lower resting motor threshold, which is related to higher corticospinal excitability, had increased 2-back working memory performance. The findings may help to better understand the link between cortical excitability and cognitive functions and may also have important clinical implications with regard to conditions of altered cortical excitability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.