ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014
Feasibility and safety of a novel reverse puncture device (RPD) for laparoscopic esophagogastrostomy/esophagojejunostomy.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel and Feasible Intracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy Anastomosis in Totally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Surgery: Sutureless L-Shape with Endoscopic Assistance (SLEJ).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- A Modified Anastomosis Technique for Esophagojejunostomy after Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy: A Single Team Preliminary Experience.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2022Article
- Comparison of OrVil™ and RPD in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Comparison of reverse puncture device and overlap in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Journal of minimal access surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to report the feasibility and safety of the technique after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) or laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG): intracorporeal circular stapling esophagogastrostomy/esophagojejunostomy using the reverse puncture device (RPD).
methodsLaparoscopy-assisted esophagogastrostomy/esophagojejunostomy was performed in 14 gastric cancer cases and 4 cases of cardiac stromal tumors using a newly developed RPD to place the anvil. After LATG or LAPG, an approximately 2 cm transverse incision was made at the esophagus anterior wall at 2 cm above the cardia and the RPD was then introduced via the incision. The end of the RPD was sutured out "reversely" at 3 cm above the esophagotomy incision. Double-stapling esophagogastrostomy/esophagojejunostomy with a circular stapler was then performed under laparoscopic assistance.
resultsThere was no intraoperative complication or conversion to open surgery, the mean operation time was 155 min, the mean anvil placement time was 12 min, and the mean blood loss was 75 mL. Patients resumed oral liquid diet on postoperative day 2, and discharged at day 10. There was no mortality, no anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, intra-abdominal infections or other complications. No recurrence was found during the 11 to 25 month follow up. Postoperative gastrointestinal iodine solution radiography revealed no anastomosis leakage or stenosis.
conclusionsWe have successfully performed LATG or LAPG reconstruction using our technique in 18 patients without any complications. We believe that our procedure is a secure and reliable reconstruction method, and is especially useful in obese patients, in whom conventional manipulations are often difficult.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25356102PMC4211752W307805442What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.