Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25356089›Full record

ArticleThe open cardiovascular medicine journal2014

Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility for radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain echocardiography.

R Leischik, B Dworrak, K Hensel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The open cardiovascular medicine journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ChatGPT Helped Me Write This Talk Title, but Can It Read an Echocardiogram?Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cardiovascular Evaluation of Children With Malignancies.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial ischemia.Annals of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R LeischikDepartment of Cardiology, Section Prevention and Sports Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Hagen, Germany.
B DworrakDepartment of Cardiology, Section Prevention and Sports Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Hagen, Germany.
K HenselHelios Children Hospital, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Wuppertal, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStrain echocardiography (StE) promises to be a new tool for quantitative assessment of cardiac function. Analysis of intra- and interobserver reliability is an important aspect in the process of developing these novel techniques from theory to the implementation into daily routine diagnostics.The purpose of the study was to estimate reliability of the segmental StE.

methodsLeft ventricular strain analysis for radial strain (RS), circumferential strain (CS) and longitudinal strain (LS) was performed in 21 healthy volunteers. RS and CS values were obtained in the parasternal short axis at the level of the papillary muscles. LS values were determined in the apical 2-, 3- and 4-chamber views. Cine-loops were recorded and quantitative analyses were conducted on an off-line workstation.

resultsIntraobserver reproducibility was highest using LS in the 4-chamber view (9 ± 13.6 % mean deviation, rho = 0.624, p = 0.003), followed by CS (13.3 ± 8.3 %, rho = 0.406, p = 0.068) and lowest in RS (26.3 ± 30.1 %, rho = 0.391, p = 0.080). Interobserver analyses of LS derived from 3-chamber view showed lowest deviation (11.9 ± 9.5 %, rho = 0.513, p = 0.017), followed by CS (15.2 ± 12.0 %, 0.263, p = 0.249) and the least consistent measurements in RS (35.9 ± 46.3 %, rho 0.382, p = 0.088).

conclusionThis study shows that the clinical utility of StE depends on the regional differences of LV wall motion and image quality. LS-values showed promising intra- and interobserver reproducibility values. For quantitative follow-up studies LS should be preferred.

Indexed as

Interobserver-varabilityintraobserver-variabilityreproducibilitystrain.

Identifiers

PMID25356089
PMCPMC4211138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.