Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25356087›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2014

Determining parental origin of embryo aneuploidy: analysis of genetic error observed in 305 embryos derived from anonymous donor oocyte IVF cycles.

E Scott Sills, Xiang Li, Jane L Frederick, Charlotte D Khoury, Daniel A Potter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Ovarian reserve testing: assessing oocyte quantity and quality.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Male infertility: establishing sperm aneuploidy thresholds in the laboratory.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hysteroscopy Findings after Two Previous FailedNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

E Scott SillsHRC Fertility-Orange County, 500 Superior Ave., Suite 210, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA ; Division of Applied Biotechnology, Faculty of Science & Technology, University of Westminster, London, UK.
Xiang LiDivision of Analytics & Quantitative Research, Rosenblatt Securities Inc, New York, NY USA.
Jane L FrederickHRC Fertility-Orange County, 500 Superior Ave., Suite 210, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA.
Charlotte D KhouryHRC Fertility-Orange County, 500 Superior Ave., Suite 210, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA.
Daniel A PotterHRC Fertility-Orange County, 500 Superior Ave., Suite 210, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA.
Orange County School · USQuantitative BioSciences · USUniversity of Westminster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince oocyte donors are typically young and believed to be a source of highly competent gametes, donor oocyte IVF is considered to be an effective treatment for diminished ovarian reserve. However, the aneuploidy rate for embryos originating from anonymously donated oocytes remains incompletely characterized. Here, comprehensive chromosomal screening results were reviewed from embryos obtained from anonymous donor-egg IVF cycles to determine both the aneuploidy rate and parental source of the genetic error. To measure this, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) data on embryos were retrospectively collated with parental DNA obtained before IVF for chromosome-specific assessments. This approach permitted mitotic and meiotic copy errors to be differentiated for each chromosome among all embryos tested, thus providing information on the parental source of embryo aneuploidy (i.e., from the anonymous egg donor vs. sperm source).

results305 embryos generated for 24 patients who began IVF treatment in 2013. For oocyte donors (n = 24), mean (±SD) age was 24.0 ± 2.7 years (range = 20-29). For embryos with full chromosomal reporting (n = 284), euploidy was present in only 133 (46.8%). Considering all embryo chromosomes, the average error rate was 18%. 133 of 151 observed embryo aneuploidies (88.1%) were attributable to an oocyte donor source. Among all aneuploid embryos (n = 151), chromosomal errors from both genetic parents (i.e., oocyte donor and sperm source) were present in 57%. The average correlation coefficient across all pairs of chromosomal abnormalities (r = 0.60) suggests that chromosomes tend to have multiple and simultaneous errors (complex aneuploidy) even when oocytes from young donors are used.

conclusionThese data show that even when young donors provide oocytes for IVF, the probability of embryo aneuploidy remains high. The oocyte donor appears to make an important contribution to embryo aneuploidy even when her age is <30 yrs. If these findings are confirmed with larger, prospective studies, the routine integration of PGS with donor oocyte IVF cycles to identify single euploid embryos for transfer should be considered.

Identifiers

PMID25356087
PMCPMC4212126
OpenAlexW2117947809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.