Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25356060›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Effect of gastrectomy with bursectomy on prognosis of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Wei-Song Shen, Hong-Qing Xi, Bo Wei, Lin Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. LESSONS LEARNED ANALYZING COMPLICATIONS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR GASTRIC CANCER.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2020
    Article
  6. Changing Trends in Gastric Cancer Surgery.Balkan medical journal · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Bursectomy at radical gastrectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei-Song ShenWei-Song Shen, Hong-Qing Xi, Bo Wei, Lin Chen, Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Hong-Qing XiWei-Song Shen, Hong-Qing Xi, Bo Wei, Lin Chen, Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Bo WeiWei-Song Shen, Hong-Qing Xi, Bo Wei, Lin Chen, Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Lin ChenWei-Song Shen, Hong-Qing Xi, Bo Wei, Lin Chen, Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effect of bursectomy on overall survival, recurrence-free survival and safety of patients with gastric cancer by performing a meta-analysis.

methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for clinical research that compared bursectomy with non-bursectomy published before October 2013. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established and applied. Overall survival, recurrence-free survival, complications, hospital stay, operative time and blood loss were compared using hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks and weighted mean differences. Stata 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis.

resultsFour studies including 1130 patients were available for the analysis (430 in the bursectomy group, 700 in the non-bursectomy group). No statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of complications between the bursectomy group and the non-bursectomy group. Bursectomy did not have a significant effect (combined HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.88-1.47) on overall survival, and it was not a significant factor for recurrence-free survival (combined HR = 1.06, 95%CI: 0.82-1.37).

conclusionGastrectomy with bursectomy is not superior to non-bursectomy in terms of survival. Bursectomy is not recommended as a routine procedure for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Disease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionGastrectomyHumansLength of StayNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOdds RatioOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBursectomyGastrectomyGastric cancerMeta-analysisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID25356060
PMCPMC4209563
OpenAlexW2061087448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.