Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355993›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2014

Association between the genetic similarity of the open reading frame 5 sequence of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and the similarity in clinical signs of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in Ontario swine herds.

Thomas Rosendal, Cate Dewey, Robert Friendship, Sarah Wootton, Beth Young, Zvonimir Poljak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas RosendalDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Rosendal, Dewey, Friendship, Young, Poljak); Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Wootton), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Cate DeweyDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Rosendal, Dewey, Friendship, Young, Poljak); Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Wootton), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Robert FriendshipDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Rosendal, Dewey, Friendship, Young, Poljak); Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Wootton), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Sarah WoottonDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Rosendal, Dewey, Friendship, Young, Poljak); Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Wootton), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Beth YoungDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Rosendal, Dewey, Friendship, Young, Poljak); Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Wootton), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
Zvonimir PoljakDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Rosendal, Dewey, Friendship, Young, Poljak); Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Wootton), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A study of Ontario swine farms positive for Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) tested the association between genetic similarity of the virus and similarity of clinical signs reported by the herd owner. Herds were included if a positive result of polymerase chain reaction for PRRSV at the Animal Health Laboratory at the University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, was found between September 2004 and August 2007. Nucleotide-sequence similarity and clinical similarity, as determined from a telephone survey, were calculated for all pairs of herds. The Mantel test indicated that clinical similarity and sequence similarity were weakly correlated for most clinical signs. The generalized additive model indicated that virus homology with 2 vaccine viruses affected the association between sequence similarity and clinical similarity. When the data for herds with vaccine-like virus were removed from the dataset there was a significant association between virus similarity and similarity of the reported presence of abortion, stillbirth, preweaning mortality, and sow/boar mortality. Ownership similarity was also found to be associated with virus similarity and with similarity of the reported presence of sows being off-feed, nursery respiratory disease, nursery mortality, finisher respiratory disease, and finisher mortality. These results indicate that clinical signs of PRRS are associated with PRRSV genotype and that herd ownership is associated with both of these.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleMaleMultivariate AnalysisOntarioOpen Reading FramesPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusPregnancyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSequence Analysis, DNAStatistics, NonparametricSwineViral VaccinesRNA, ViralViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25355993
PMCPMC4170763
OpenAlexW2400833105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.