Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355975›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2014

Media use and communication inequalities in a public health emergency: a case study of 2009-2010 pandemic influenza A virus subtype H1N1.

Leesa Lin, Minsoo Jung, Rachel F McCloud, Kasisomayajula Viswanath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of media on preventive behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Spanish-Language News Consumption and Latino Reactions to COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leesa LinDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Center for Community-Based Research, Boston, MA ; Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA ; Harvard School of Public Health, Division of Policy Translation and Leadership Development, Boston, MA.
Minsoo JungDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Center for Community-Based Research, Boston, MA ; Dongduk Women's University, Department of Health Science, Seoul, South Korea.
Rachel F McCloudDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Center for Community-Based Research, Boston, MA ; Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA.
Kasisomayajula ViswanathDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Center for Community-Based Research, Boston, MA ; Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA.

Funding

OPHPR CDC HHS 5P01TP000307-05OPHPR CDC HHS P01 TP000307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStudies have shown that differences among individuals and social groups in accessing and using information on health and specific threats have an impact on their knowledge and behaviors. These differences, characterized as communication inequalities, may hamper the strength of a society's response to a public health emergency. Such inequalities not only make vulnerable populations subject to a disproportionate burden of adversity, but also compromise the public health system's efforts to prevent and respond to pandemic influenza outbreaks. We investigated the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) and health communication behaviors (including barriers) on people's knowledge and misconceptions about pandemic influenza A(H1N1) (pH1N1) and adoption of prevention behaviors.

methodsThe data for this study came from a survey of 1,569 respondents drawn from a nationally representative sample of American adults during pH1N1. We conducted logistic regression analyses when appropriate.

resultsWe found that (1) SES has a significant association with barriers to information access and processing, levels of pH1N1-related knowledge, and misconceptions; (2) levels of pH1N1-related knowledge are associated positively with the adoption of recommended prevention measures and negatively with the adoption of incorrect protective behaviors; and (3) people with higher SES, higher news exposure, and higher levels of pH1N1-related knowledge, as well as those who actively seek information, are less likely than their counterparts to adopt incorrect prevention behaviors.

conclusionStrategic public health communication efforts in public health preparedness and during emergencies should take into account potential communication inequalities and develop campaigns that reach across different social groups.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInterdisciplinary CommunicationMass MediaAdultEmergenciesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PlanningHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMaleOrganizational InnovationPandemicsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25355975
PMCPMC4187307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.