Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355799›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2015

Performance evaluation of the Elecsys syphilis assay for the detection of total antibodies to Treponema pallidum.

Martin Enders, Andrea Hunjet, Michael Gleich, Roland Imdahl, Annelies Mühlbacher, Harald Schennach, Kriangsak Chaiwong, Tasanee Sakuldamrongpanich, Ajda Turhan, Rüchan Sertöz and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical Evaluation of Fully Automated ElecsysJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Better method for evaluating a new laboratory test for syphilis.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Martin EndersLaboratory of G. Enders & Colleagues, MVZ and Institute of Virology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology e.V., Stuttgart, Germany.
Andrea HunjetLaboratory of G. Enders & Colleagues, MVZ and Institute of Virology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology e.V., Stuttgart, Germany.
Michael GleichLabor Schottdorf MVZ GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
Roland ImdahlLabor Schottdorf MVZ GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
Annelies MühlbacherCentral Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Harald SchennachCentral Institute for Blood Transfusion and Immunology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Kriangsak ChaiwongNational Blood Center, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tasanee SakuldamrongpanichNational Blood Center, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ajda TurhanFaculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Rüchan SertözFaculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Eva WolfMUC Research GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang MayerImmumed GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Chuanmin TaoWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lan Lan WangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Simona SempriniThe Greater Romagna Area Hub Laboratory, Unit of Microbiology, Pievesestina, Cesena, Italy.
Vittorio SambriThe Greater Romagna Area Hub Laboratory, Unit of Microbiology, Pievesestina, Cesena, Italy vittorio.sambri@unibo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syphilis is a health problem of increasing incidence in recent years that may have severe complications if not diagnosed and treated at an early stage. There are many diagnostic tests available for syphilis, but there is no gold standard, and diagnosis therefore usually relies upon a combination of tests. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the treponemal Elecsys syphilis assay for use in the diagnosis of syphilis in routine samples, i.e., when syphilis is suspected or during antenatal or blood donation screening. The sensitivity and specificity of the Elecsys syphilis assay were compared head to head with those of other treponemal assays used in routine clinical practice and were assessed in potentially cross-reactive samples from patients with Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, and Lyme disease. In a total of 8,063 syphilis-negative samples collected from routine diagnostic requests and blood donations, the Elecsys syphilis assay had a specificity of 99.88%. In 928 samples previously identified as syphilis positive, the sensitivity was 99.57 to 100% (the result is presented as a range depending on whether four initially indeterminate samples are included in the assessment). The specificity of the Elecsys syphilis assay in patients with other infections was 100%; no false-positive samples were identified.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansImmunoassayReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilisTreponema pallidumAntibodies, BacterialReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID25355799
PMCPMC4278932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.