Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355770›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Harmonization of Bordetella pertussis real-time PCR diagnostics in the United States in 2012.

Margaret M Williams, Thomas H Taylor, David M Warshauer, Monte D Martin, Ann M Valley, M Lucia Tondella

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. StrengtheningJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Commercial Assays for Single-Point Diagnosis of Pertussis in the US.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2017
    Article
  9. Widespread Bordetella parapertussis Infections-Wisconsin, 2011-2012: Clinical and Epidemiologic Features and Antibiotic Use for Treatment and Prevention.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Laboratory Diagnosis of Pertussis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margaret M WilliamsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA mwilliams7@cdc.gov.
Thomas H TaylorCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
David M WarshauerWisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Monte D MartinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ann M ValleyWisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
M Lucia TondellaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time PCR (rt-PCR) is an important diagnostic tool for the identification of Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella holmesii, and Bordetella parapertussis. Most U.S. public health laboratories (USPHLs) target IS481, present in 218 to 238 copies in the B. pertussis genome and 32 to 65 copies in B. holmesii. The CDC developed a multitarget PCR assay to differentiate B. pertussis, B. holmesii, and B. parapertussis and provided protocols and training to 19 USPHLs. The 2012 performance exercise (PE) assessed the capability of USPHLs to detect these three Bordetella species in clinical samples. Laboratories were recruited by the Wisconsin State Proficiency Testing program through the Association of Public Health Laboratories, in partnership with the CDC. Spring and fall PE panels contained 12 samples each of viable Bordetella and non-Bordetella species in saline. Fifty and 53 USPHLs participated in the spring and fall PEs, respectively, using a variety of nucleic acid extraction methods, PCR platforms, and assays. Ninety-six percent and 94% of laboratories targeted IS481 in spring and fall, respectively, in either singleplex or multiplex assays. In spring and fall, respectively, 72% and 79% of USPHLs differentiated B. pertussis and B. holmesii and 68% and 72% identified B. parapertussis. IS481 cycle threshold (CT) values for B. pertussis samples had coefficients of variation (CV) ranging from 10% to 28%. Of the USPHLs that differentiated B. pertussis and B. holmesii, sensitivity was 96% and specificity was 95% for the combined panels. The 2012 PE demonstrated increased harmonization of rt-PCR Bordetella diagnostic protocols in USPHLs compared to that of the previous survey.

Indexed as

Bordetella pertussisHistory, 21st CenturyHumansLaboratory Proficiency TestingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUnited StatesWhooping Cough

Identifiers

PMID25355770
PMCPMC4290909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.