Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355701›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2015

Inhibition of EGFR or IGF-1R signaling enhances radiation response in head and neck cancer models but concurrent inhibition has no added benefit.

Uma Raju, David P Molkentine, David R Valdecanas, Amit Deorukhkar, Kathryn A Mason, Thomas A Buchholz, Raymond E Meyn, Kie-Kian Ang, Heath Skinner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uma RajuDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
David P Molkentine
David R Valdecanas
Amit Deorukhkar
Kathryn A Mason
Thomas A Buchholz
Raymond E Meyn
Kie-Kian Ang
Heath Skinner
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Extension of Radiotherapy ResearchR01CA168485 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SKINNER, HEATH DEVIN · 2011 to 2021
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168485NCI NIH HHS R01-CA168485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaction between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) has been well established in many cancer types. We investigated the effects of cetuximab (EGFR antibody) and IMC-A12 (IGF-1R antibody) on the response of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to radiation therapy (RT). The effects of cetuximab and IMC-A12 on cell viability and radiosensitivity were determined by clonogenic cell survival assay. Formation of nuclear γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci was monitored by immunofluorescence. Alterations in target signaling were analyzed by Western blots. In vivo tumor growth delay assay was performed to determine the efficacy of triple therapy with IMC-A12, cetuximab, and RT. In vitro data showed that cetuximab differentially affected the survival and the radiosensitivity of HNSCC cells. Cetuximab suppressed DNA repair that was evident by the prolonged presence of nuclear γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci. IMC-A12 did not have any effect on the cell survival. However, it increased the radiosensitivity of one of the cell lines. EGFR inhibition increased IGF-1R expression levels and also the association between EGFR and IGF-1R. Addition of IMC-A12 to cetuximab did not increase the radiosensitivity of these cells. Tumor xenografts exhibited enhanced response to RT in the presence of either cetuximab or IMC-A12. Concurrent treatment regimen failed to further enhance the tumor response to cetuximab and/or RT. Taken together our data suggest that concomitant inhibition of both EGFR and IGF-1R pathways did not yield additional therapeutic benefit in overcoming resistance to RT.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCetuximabDisease Models, AnimalDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedErbB ReceptorsGene ExpressionHead and Neck NeoplasmsHistonesHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein MultimerizationRadiationAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabErbB ReceptorsHistonesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsReceptor, IGF Type 1TP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Head and neck squamous cell carcinomaIGF-1R and EGFR signalingradiosensitivitytumor response to radiation

Identifiers

PMID25355701
PMCPMC4312119
OpenAlexW2039579824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.