Nanoparticles: take only pictures, leave only footprints.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Gram-scale synthesis of coordination polymer nanodots with renal clearance properties for cancer theranostic applications.Nature communications · 2015
   Article
2. Positron emission tomography imaging using radiolabeled inorganic nanomaterials.Accounts of chemical research · 2015
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Endoscopic molecular imaging of human bladder cancer using a CD47 antibody.2014
• Comment on
  Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe.2014

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as