Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355481›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Predator-vole interactions in Northern Europe: the role of small mustelids revised.

Katri Korpela, Pekka Helle, Heikki Henttonen, Erkki Korpimäki, Esa Koskela, Otso Ovaskainen, Hannu Pietiäinen, Janne Sundell, Jari Valkama, Otso Huitu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Invasive Bank Vole (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Hantaviruses and a neglected environmental determinant.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katri KorpelaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Pekka HelleFinnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.
Heikki HenttonenVantaa Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland.
Erkki KorpimäkiDepartment of Biology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Finland.
Esa KoskelaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Otso OvaskainenDepartment of Biosciences University of Helsinki, Finland.
Hannu PietiäinenDepartment of Biosciences University of Helsinki, Finland.
Janne SundellLammi Biological Station, University of Helsinki, FI-16900 Lammi, Finland.
Jari ValkamaFinnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
Otso HuituSuonenjoki Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland otso.huitu@metla.fi.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIFinnish Museum of Natural History · FIUniversity of Oulu · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

European Research Council 205905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cyclic population dynamics of vole and predator communities is a key phenomenon in northern ecosystems, and it appears to be influenced by climate change. Reports of collapsing rodent cycles have attributed the changes to warmer winters, which weaken the interaction between voles and their specialist subnivean predators. Using population data collected throughout Finland during 1986-2011, we analyse the spatio-temporal variation in the interactions between populations of voles and specialist, generalist and avian predators, and investigate by simulations the roles of the different predators in the vole cycle. We test the hypothesis that vole population cyclicity is dependent on predator-prey interactions during winter. Our results support the importance of the small mustelids for the vole cycle. However, weakening specialist predation during winters, or an increase in generalist predation, was not associated with the loss of cyclicity. Strengthening of delayed density dependence coincided with strengthening small mustelid influence on the summer population growth rates of voles. In conclusion, a strong impact of small mustelids during summers appears highly influential to vole population dynamics, and deteriorating winter conditions are not a viable explanation for collapsing small mammal population cycles.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorAnimalsArvicolinaeBirdsClimate ChangeEuropeMammalsModels, TheoreticalPopulation DensityPopulation Dynamicsdensity dependencepopulation cyclespopulation dynamicspopulation growth rate

Identifiers

PMID25355481
PMCPMC4241000
OpenAlexW2058930191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.