Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355476›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Comparative brain transcriptomic analyses of scouting across distinct behavioural and ecological contexts in honeybees.

Zhengzheng S Liang, Heather R Mattila, Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas, Bruce R Southey, Thomas D Seeley, Gene E Robinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhengzheng S LiangNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Heather R MattilaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.
Sandra L Rodriguez-ZasNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Bruce R SoutheyDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Thomas D SeeleyDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Gene E RobinsonNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA generobi@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USCornell University · USWellesley College · US

Funding

Johnny Bee Good: Bees as Models to Study the Hijacking of the Reward SystemDP1OD006416 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ROBINSON, GENE E · 2009 to 2011
$2.4M
NIH HHS 1DP1OD006416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in behaviour are often consistent across time and contexts, but it is not clear whether such consistency is reflected at the molecular level. We explored this issue by studying scouting in honeybees in two different behavioural and ecological contexts: finding new sources of floral food resources and finding a new nest site. Brain gene expression profiles in food-source and nest-site scouts showed a significant overlap, despite large expression differences associated with the two different contexts. Class prediction and 'leave-one-out' cross-validation analyses revealed that a bee's role as a scout in either context could be predicted with 92.5% success using 89 genes at minimum. We also found that genes related to four neurotransmitter systems were part of a shared brain molecular signature in both types of scouts, and the two types of scouts were more similar for genes related to glutamate and GABA than catecholamine or acetylcholine signalling. These results indicate that consistent behavioural tendencies across different ecological contexts involve a mixture of similarities and differences in brain gene expression.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalTranscriptomeAnimalsBeesBrainGene Expression ProfilingInsect ProteinsInsect Proteinsanimal personalitygene expressionindividual differencesnovelty seekingsocial insects

Identifiers

PMID25355476
PMCPMC4240991
OpenAlexW2125885379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.