Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355374›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2015

Relative risk of injury from acute alcohol consumption: modeling the dose-response relationship in emergency department data from 18 countries.

Cheryl J Cherpitel, Yu Ye, Jason Bond, Guilherme Borges, Maristela Monteiro

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Do socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity modify the relationship between alcohol use and unintentional injury mortality?Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Road traffic injury risk from alcohol and cannabis use among emergency department patients in Argentina.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Trends and disparities in American Indian/Alaska Native unintentional injury mortality from 1999 to 2016.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cheryl J CherpitelStatistical and Data Services Department, Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Yu Ye
Jason Bond
Guilherme Borges
Maristela Monteiro
Alcohol Research Group · USInstituto Nacional de Psiquiatría · MXWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · US

Funding

TREND &STRUCTURE OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE--GENERAL POPULATION 1990 SURVEY DATAP50AA005595 · NIAAA · WESTERN CONSORTIUM FOR PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MARTINEZ, PRISCILLA · 1985 to 2025
$34.1M
Statistical and Data Services Infrastructure CoreP30AA005595 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI GREENFIELD, THOMAS K · 2006 to 2010
$7.2M
Cross-National Analysis of Alcohol & InjuryR01AA013750 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI CHERPITEL, CHERYL J · 2002 to 2018
$4.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA 005595NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS R01 2 AA013750-04NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo update and extend analysis of the dose-response relationship of injury and drinking by demographic and injury subgroups and country-level drinking pattern, and examine the validity and efficiency of the fractional polynomial approach to modeling this relationship.

designPair-matched case-cross-over analysis of drinking prior to injury, using categorical step-function and fractional polynomial analysis.

settingThirty-seven emergency departments (EDs) across 18 countries.

participantsA total of 13 119 injured drinkers arriving at the ED within 6 hours of the event. MEASUREMENTS: The dose-response relationship was analyzed by gender, age, cause of injury (traffic, violence, fall, other) and country detrimental drinking pattern (DDP).

findingsEstimated risks were similar between the two analytical methods, with injury risk doubling at one drink [odds ratio (OR) = 2.3-2.7] and peaking at about 30 drinks. Although risk was similar for males and females up to three drinks (OR = 4.6), it appeared to increase more rapidly for females and was significantly higher starting from 20 drinks [female OR = 28.6; confidence interval (CI) = 16.8, 48.9; male OR = 12.8; CI = 10.1, 16.3]. No significant differences were found across age groups. Risk was significantly higher for violence-related injury than for other causes across the volume range. Risk was also higher at all volumes for DDP-3 compared with DDP-2 countries.

conclusionsThere is an increasing risk relationship between alcohol and injury but risk is not uniform across gender, cause of injury or country drinking pattern. The fractional polynomial approach is a valid and efficient approach for modeling the alcohol injury risk relationship.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesCase-Control StudiesCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedDetrimental drinking patterndose-responseemergency departmentgenderinjury causeinjury risk

Identifiers

PMID25355374
PMCPMC4302018
OpenAlexW1857261370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.