ReviewEndocrine2015
Remission of type 2 diabetes: is bariatric surgery ready for prime time?
Review in Endocrine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rationale and design of the Early Sleeve gastrectomy In New Onset Diabetic Obese Patients (ESINODOP) trial.Endocrine · 2017Trial
- Impact of a behavioral weight loss intervention on comorbidities in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Trial
- Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) with Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) in Bariatric Surgery.Cureus · 2021Article
- Genetic Testing to Predict Weight Loss and Diabetes Remission and Long-Term Sustainability after Bariatric Surgery: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- The endocrinology of taste receptors.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is mounting evidence that bariatric surgery leads to higher remission rates of type 2 diabetes than any conventional medical treatment, lifestyle intervention, or medically supervised weight loss program. Although remission rates of type 2 diabetes may be as high as 66.7 % after gastric bypass and 28.6 % after gastric band, very few bariatric surgery studies report long-term results with sufficient patient follow-up to minimize biased results. Hence, trials that directly compare bariatric surgery procedures with medical and lifestyle intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes are the best candidate for assessing the role of bariatric surgery in diabetes remission. Three randomized controlled trials and one prospective study have so far been published comparing the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure against optimal medical therapy, with a follow-up ranging from 1 to 6 years: the percentage of diabetic patients in remission (hemoglobin A1C < 6-6.5 % without medications) ranged from 38 to 75 % at the end of follow-up. Intensive lifestyle intervention is also superior to conventional treatment for inducing remission of type 2 diabetes, with remission rates of type 2 diabetes between 10 and 15 % at 1 year of follow-up. Bariatric surgical procedures, especially RYGB, are more effective at inducing initial type 2 diabetes remission in obese patients, but more information is needed about the long-term durability of comorbidity control and complications after bariatric procedures. In the meantime, all efforts should be directed toward primary prevention of type 2 diabetes, given the encouraging results of lifestyle intervention studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.