Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355293›Full record

ReviewCarcinogenesis2014

Base excision repair capacity in informing healthspan.

Boris M Brenerman, Jennifer L Illuzzi, David M Wilson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carcinogenesis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DNA Damage and Repair in Eye Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. In vivo measurements of interindividual differences in DNA glycosylases and APE1 activities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Imaging the DNA damage response with PET and SPECT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Review
  20. Coordination of DNA single strand break repair.Free radical biology & medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boris M BrenermanLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Jennifer L IlluzziLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
David M WilsonLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA wilsonda@mail.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Base Excision DNA Repair in Disease Susceptibility and TreatmentZIAAG000750 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI BOHR, VILHELM A · 2009 to 2019
$5.4M
Base Excision DNA Repair in Disease Susceptibility and TreatmentZ01AG000750 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI WILSON, DAVID · 2008 to 2008
$190k
Intramural NIH HHSNIA NIH HHS Z01 AG000750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Base excision repair (BER) is a frontline defense mechanism for dealing with many common forms of endogenous DNA damage, several of which can drive mutagenic or cell death outcomes. The pathway engages proteins such as glycosylases, abasic endonucleases, polymerases and ligases to remove substrate modifications from DNA and restore the genome back to its original state. Inherited mutations in genes related to BER can give rise to disorders involving cancer, immunodeficiency and neurodegeneration. Studies employing genetically defined heterozygous (haploinsufficient) mouse models indicate that partial reduction in BER capacity can increase vulnerability to both spontaneous and exposure-dependent pathologies. In humans, measurement of BER variation has been imperfect to this point, yet tools to assess BER in epidemiological surveys are steadily evolving. We provide herein an overview of the BER pathway and discuss the current efforts toward defining the relationship of BER defects with disease susceptibility.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityAnimalsDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID25355293
PMCPMC4247524
OpenAlexW2324250718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.