Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25355179›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2015

Comparison of intervention fidelity between COPE TEEN and an attention-control program in a randomized controlled trial.

Stephanie A Kelly, Krista Oswalt, Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Diana Jacobson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie A KellyCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neal Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Prevention Research Center, Arizona State University, 900 S. McAllister Ave, Suite 205, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA and College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 400 N. 3 St, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA stephanie.kelly@zona.net kelly.901@osu.edu.
Krista OswaltCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neal Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Prevention Research Center, Arizona State University, 900 S. McAllister Ave, Suite 205, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA and College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 400 N. 3 St, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Bernadette Mazurek MelnykCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neal Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Prevention Research Center, Arizona State University, 900 S. McAllister Ave, Suite 205, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA and College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 400 N. 3 St, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Diana JacobsonCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neal Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Prevention Research Center, Arizona State University, 900 S. McAllister Ave, Suite 205, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA and College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 400 N. 3 St, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.

Funding

COPE/Healthy Lifestyles for Teens: A School-Based RCTR01NR012171 · NINR · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MELNYK, BERNADETTE M · 2009 to 2012
$2.3M
NINR NIH HHS 1R01NR012171NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fidelity in implementing an intervention is critical to accurately determine and interpret the effects of an intervention. It is important to monitor the manner in which the behavioral intervention is implemented (e.g. adaptations, delivery as intended and dose). Few interventions are implemented with 100% fidelity. In this study, high school health teachers implemented the intervention. To attribute study findings to the intervention, it was vital to know to what degree the intervention was implemented. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to evaluate intervention fidelity and to compare implementation fidelity between the creating opportunities for personal empowerment (COPE) Healthy Lifestyles TEEN (thinking, emotions, exercise, and nutrition) program, the experimental intervention and Healthy Teens, an attention-control intervention, in a randomized controlled trial with 779 adolescents from 11 high schools in the southwest region of the United States. Thirty teachers participated in this study. Findings indicated that the attention-control teachers implemented their intervention with greater fidelity than COPE TEEN teachers. It is possible due to the novel intervention and the teachers' unfamiliarity with cognitive-behavioral skills building, COPE TEEN teachers had less fidelity. It is important to assess novel skill development prior to the commencement of experimental interventions and to provide corrective feedback during the course of implementation.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth EducationLife StylePower, PsychologicalSchool Health ServicesAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultDietExerciseHumansMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareSelf ConceptUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25355179
PMCPMC4364055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.