ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2014
Implementation of new clinical programs in the VHA healthcare system: the importance of early collaboration between clinical leadership and research.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using brief reflections to capture and evaluate end-user engagement: a case example using the COMPASS study.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Trial
- Trends in lung cancer survival: superior outcomes in US Veterans compared with the general population.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- From patient outcomes to system change: Evaluating the impact of VHA's implementation of the Whole Health System of Care.Health services research · 2022Article
- Leveraging the ExpandNet framework and operational partnerships to scale-up brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in VA primary care clinics.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Learning health systems in primary care: a systematic scoping review.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Dynamic Diffusion Network: Advancing moral injury care and suicide prevention using an innovative model.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Strategies for Building Delivery Science in an Integrated Health Care System.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Review
- Linkage between theory-based measurement of organizational readiness for change and lessons learned conducting quality improvement-focused research.Learning health systems · 2017Article
- Readiness for Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening. A National Survey of Veterans Affairs Pulmonologists.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collaboration between policy, research, and clinical partners is crucial to achieving proven quality care. The Veterans Health Administration has expended great efforts towards fostering such collaborations. Through this, we have learned that an ideal collaboration involves partnership from the very beginning of a new clinical program, so that the program is designed in a way that ensures quality, validity, and puts into place the infrastructure necessary for a reliable evaluation. This paper will give an example of one such project, the Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project (LCSDP). We will outline the ways that clinical, policy, and research partners collaborated in design, planning, and implementation in order to create a sustainable model that could be rigorously evaluated for efficacy and fidelity. We will describe the use of the Donabedian quality matrix to determine the necessary characteristics of a quality program and the importance of the linkage with engineering, information technology, and clinical paradigms to connect the development of an on-the-ground clinical program with the evaluation goal of a learning healthcare organization. While the LCSDP is the example given here, these partnerships and suggestions are salient to any healthcare organization seeking to implement new scientifically proven care in a useful and reliable way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.