Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25353688›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Islands and stepping-stones: comparative population structure of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and Anopheles arabiensis in Tanzania and implications for the spread of insecticide resistance.

Deodatus Maliti, Hilary Ranson, Stephen Magesa, William Kisinza, Juma Mcha, Khamis Haji, Gerald Killeen, David Weetman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Variation in spatial population structure in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Deodatus MalitiIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania; University of Glasgow, Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Glasgow, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Hilary RansonDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Merseyside, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Stephen MagesaRTI International, Global Health Division, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
William KisinzaNational Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Center, Muheza, Tanga, United Republic of Tanzania.
Juma MchaZanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Unguja, Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania.
Khamis HajiZanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Unguja, Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania.
Gerald KilleenIfakara Health Institute, Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara, Morogoro, United Republic of Tanzania; Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Merseyside, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
David WeetmanDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Merseyside, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBZanzibar University · TZIfakara Health Institute · TZNational Institute for Medical Research · TZPlan International Tanzania · TZUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 08703/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population genetic structures of the two major malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis, differ markedly across Sub-Saharan Africa, which could reflect differences in historical demographies or in contemporary gene flow. Elucidation of the degree and cause of population structure is important for predicting the spread of genetic traits such as insecticide resistance genes or artificially engineered genes. Here the population genetics of An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis in the central, eastern and island regions of Tanzania were compared. Microsatellite markers were screened in 33 collections of female An. gambiae s.l., originating from 22 geographical locations, four of which were sampled in two or three years between 2008 and 2010. An. gambiae were sampled from six sites, An. arabiensis from 14 sites, and both species from two sites, with an additional colonised insectary sample of each species. Frequencies of the knock-down resistance (kdr) alleles 1014S and 1014F were also determined. An. gambiae exhibited relatively high genetic differentiation (average pairwise FST = 0.131), significant even between nearby samples, but without clear geographical patterning. In contrast, An. arabiensis exhibited limited differentiation (average FST = 0.015), but strong isolation-by-distance (Mantel test r = 0.46, p = 0.0008). Most time-series samples of An. arabiensis were homogeneous, suggesting general temporal stability of the genetic structure. An. gambiae populations from Dar es Salaam and Bagamoyo were found to have high frequencies of kdr 1014S (around 70%), with almost 50% homozygote but was at much lower frequency on Unguja Island, with no. An. gambiae population genetic differentiation was consistent with an island model of genetic structuring with highly restricted gene flow, contrary to An. arabiensis which was consistent with a stepping-stone model of extensive, but geographically-restricted gene flow.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyGenetic SpeciationAnimalsAnophelesInsecticide ResistanceMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID25353688
PMCPMC4212992
OpenAlexW2076506126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.