Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25353327›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Repair on the go: E. coli maintains a high proliferation rate while repairing a chronic DNA double-strand break.

Elise Darmon, John K Eykelenboom, Manuel A Lopez-Vernaza, Martin A White, David R F Leach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Quantitative genomic analysis of RecA protein binding during DNA double-strand break repair reveals RecBCD action in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elise DarmonInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
John K EykelenboomInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Manuel A Lopez-VernazaInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Martin A WhiteInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
David R F LeachInstitute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage checkpoints exist to promote cell survival and the faithful inheritance of genetic information. It is thought that one function of such checkpoints is to ensure that cell division does not occur before DNA damage is repaired. However, in unicellular organisms, rapid cell multiplication confers a powerful selective advantage, leading to a dilemma. Is the activation of a DNA damage checkpoint compatible with rapid cell multiplication? By uncoupling the initiation of DNA replication from cell division, the Escherichia coli cell cycle offers a solution to this dilemma. Here, we show that a DNA double-strand break, which occurs once per replication cycle, induces the SOS response. This SOS induction is needed for cell survival due to a requirement for an elevated level of expression of the RecA protein. Cell division is delayed, leading to an increase in average cell length but with no detectable consequence on mutagenesis and little effect on growth rate and viability. The increase in cell length caused by chronic DNA double-strand break repair comprises three components: two types of increase in the unit cell size, one independent of SfiA and SlmA, the other dependent of the presence of SfiA and the absence of SlmA, and a filamentation component that is dependent on the presence of either SfiA or SlmA. These results imply that chronic checkpoint induction in E. coli is compatible with rapid cell multiplication. Therefore, under conditions of chronic low-level DNA damage, the SOS checkpoint operates seamlessly in a cell cycle where the initiation of DNA replication is uncoupled from cell division.

Indexed as

SOS Response, GeneticsCarrier ProteinsCell CycleDNA, BacterialDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialRec A RecombinasesCarrier ProteinsDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsRec A RecombinasesSlmA protein, E colisulA protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID25353327
PMCPMC4213011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.