ArticlePloS one2014
Repair on the go: E. coli maintains a high proliferation rate while repairing a chronic DNA double-strand break.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation and purification of DNA double-strand break repair intermediates for understanding complex molecular mechanisms.PloS one · 2024Article
- RecA and RecB: probing complexes of DNA repair proteins with mitomycin C in liveJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Growth-dependent heterogeneity in the DNA damage response in Escherichia coli.Molecular systems biology · 2022Article
- Bacterial cell proliferation: from molecules to cells.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021Review
- DNA double strand break repair in Escherichia coli perturbs cell division and chromosome dynamics.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- The Need for Speed: Run-On Oligomer Filament Formation Provides Maximum Speed with Maximum Sequestration of Activity.Journal of virology · 2019Article
- RecBCD coordinates repair of two ends at a DNA double-strand break, preventing aberrant chromosome amplification.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Xer Site Specific Recombination: Double and Single Recombinase Systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
- Quantitative genomic analysis of RecA protein binding during DNA double-strand break repair reveals RecBCD action in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- A surprising range of modified-methionyl S-adenosylmethionine analogues support bacterial growth.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA damage checkpoints exist to promote cell survival and the faithful inheritance of genetic information. It is thought that one function of such checkpoints is to ensure that cell division does not occur before DNA damage is repaired. However, in unicellular organisms, rapid cell multiplication confers a powerful selective advantage, leading to a dilemma. Is the activation of a DNA damage checkpoint compatible with rapid cell multiplication? By uncoupling the initiation of DNA replication from cell division, the Escherichia coli cell cycle offers a solution to this dilemma. Here, we show that a DNA double-strand break, which occurs once per replication cycle, induces the SOS response. This SOS induction is needed for cell survival due to a requirement for an elevated level of expression of the RecA protein. Cell division is delayed, leading to an increase in average cell length but with no detectable consequence on mutagenesis and little effect on growth rate and viability. The increase in cell length caused by chronic DNA double-strand break repair comprises three components: two types of increase in the unit cell size, one independent of SfiA and SlmA, the other dependent of the presence of SfiA and the absence of SlmA, and a filamentation component that is dependent on the presence of either SfiA or SlmA. These results imply that chronic checkpoint induction in E. coli is compatible with rapid cell multiplication. Therefore, under conditions of chronic low-level DNA damage, the SOS checkpoint operates seamlessly in a cell cycle where the initiation of DNA replication is uncoupled from cell division.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.