Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25353287›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2015

Branched chain in situ hybridization for albumin as a marker of hepatocellular differentiation: evaluation of manual and automated in situ hybridization platforms.

Mohammad Shahid, Aysha Mubeen, Julie Tse, Sanjay Kakar, Adrian C Bateman, Darrell Borger, Miguel N Rivera, David T Ting, Vikram Deshpande

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Inflammation Markers and HCC Aggressiveness.Journal of biomedical research & environmental sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on hepatocellular carcinoma: Pathologists' review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad ShahidDepartments of *Surgery †Pathology ∥Medicine, Division of Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA ‡UCSF and VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA §Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Aysha Mubeen
Julie Tse
Sanjay Kakar
Adrian C Bateman
Darrell Borger
Miguel N Rivera
David T Ting
Vikram Deshpande
Massachusetts General Hospital · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Consortium Career Development Program in Clinical OncologyK12CA087723 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI David Tsai Ting · 2002 to 2026
$17.9M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA087723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Albumin, widely recognized as a highly sensitive and specific marker of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is currently unavailable in the diagnostic laboratory because of the lack of a robust platform. In a prior study we detected albumin mRNA in the majority of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas using a novel branched chain RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) platform. We now explore the utility of albumin ISH as a marker of hepatocellular differentiation in HCCs, and compare its sensitivity with Hep Par 1 and Arginase-1. We evaluated 93 HCCs and its mimics including neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (n=31), neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas (n=163), melanoma (n=15), and gallbladder carcinoma (n=34). We performed ISH for albumin and immunohistochemistry for Hep Par 1 and Arginase-1. Five previously uncharacterized hepatic neoplasms from our files were also evaluated. Immunohistochemistry for Arginase-1 was performed on 59 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. In addition, 43 HCCs evaluated on the manual platform were also examined on the automated instrument. Fifty-five percent of HCCs were moderately differentiated and 39% poorly differentiated. The sensitivity of ISH for albumin was 99%, with 92 of 93 HCCs staining positive for albumin. In contrast to ISH, the sensitivity of immunohistochemistry for Hep Par 1 and Arginase-1 was 84% and 83%, respectively. The sensitivity of albumin for poorly differentiated HCCs was 99%, whereas that for Arginase-1 and Hep Par 1 was 71% and 64%, respectively. Ninety-seven percent of the HCCs showed albumin positivity in >50% of tumor cells using the ISH platform, as compared with 76% and 70% for Hep Par 1 and Arginase-1 immunohistochemistry, respectively. Three of the 5 previously uncharacterized neoplasms were positive for albumin ISH. Automated albumin ISH platform performed equivalently to the manual format, with albumin reactivity in >50% of tumor cells in all 43 cases that were tested on both platforms. All non-HCCs were negative for albumin. All 59 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were negative for Arginase-1. In conclusion, branched chain ISH performed on manual and automated mode is a robust assay for detecting albumin with sensitivity for poorly differentiated HCCs superior to Arginase-1 and Hep Par 1. When interpreted in conjunction with Arginase-1, albumin ISH offers a high level of sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAgedAged, 80 and overArginaseAutomation, LaboratoryBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCarbamoyl-Phosphate Synthase (Ammonia)Carcinoma, HepatocellularDiagnosis, DifferentialEnglandFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationLiver NeoplasmsALB protein, humanARG1 protein, humanArginaseBiomarkers, TumorCarbamoyl-Phosphate Synthase (Ammonia)RNA, MessengerSerum AlbuminSerum Albumin, Human

Identifiers

PMID25353287
PMCPMC4698370
OpenAlexW1981193765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.