Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25353168›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Parallel mechanisms for visual search in zebrafish.

Michael J Proulx, Matthew O Parker, Yasser Tahir, Caroline H Brennan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Attention-like processes in insects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J ProulxCrossmodal Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Matthew O ParkerSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Yasser TahirSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Caroline H BrennanSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Medical Research CouncilNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research G1000053/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parallel visual search mechanisms have been reported previously only in mammals and birds, and not animals lacking an expanded telencephalon such as bees. Here we report the first evidence for parallel visual search in fish using a choice task where the fish had to find a target amongst an increasing number of distractors. Following two-choice discrimination training, zebrafish were presented with the original stimulus within an increasing array of distractor stimuli. We found that zebrafish exhibit no significant change in accuracy and approach latency as the number of distractors increased, providing evidence of parallel processing. This evidence challenges theories of vertebrate neural architecture and the importance of an expanded telencephalon for the evolution of executive function.

Indexed as

Visual PerceptionAnimalsChoice BehaviorDiscrimination, PsychologicalPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID25353168
PMCPMC4213058
OpenAlexW1969383683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.